Doc: Fix description of pg_class.relreplident
authorMichael Paquier <[email protected]>
Wed, 20 May 2020 05:21:54 +0000 (14:21 +0900)
committerMichael Paquier <[email protected]>
Wed, 20 May 2020 05:21:54 +0000 (14:21 +0900)
The description missed a comma and lacked an explanation of what happens
with REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX when the dependent index is dropped.

Author: Marina Polyakova
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ad1a0badc32658b1bbb07aa312346a1d@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 9.5

doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml

index 90e10e7af821ead8e1933d923740487a984c0787..9f2273b583394000ad5fdc89e65f71519ec0b6f4 100644 (file)
@@ -1900,8 +1900,10 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable>&lt;iteration count&gt;</>:<replaceable>&lt;salt&gt;<
        Columns used to form <quote>replica identity</> for rows:
        <literal>d</> = default (primary key, if any),
        <literal>n</> = nothing,
-       <literal>f</> = all columns
-       <literal>i</> = index with <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set, or default
+       <literal>f</> = all columns,
+       <literal>i</> = index with
+       <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set (same as nothing if the
+       index used has been dropped)
       </entry>
      </row>