The U&'...' and U&"..." syntaxes silently discarded a surrogate pair
start (that is, a code between U+D800 and U+DBFF) if it occurred at
the very end of the string. This seems like an obvious oversight,
since we throw an error for every other invalid combination of surrogate
characters, including the very same situation in E'...' syntax.
This has been wrong since the pair processing was added (in 9.0),
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19113.
1482337898@sss.pgh.pa.us
}
}
+ /* unfinished surrogate pair? */
+ if (pair_first)
+ {
+ ADVANCE_YYLLOC(in - litbuf + 3); /* 3 for U&" */
+ yyerror("invalid Unicode surrogate pair");
+ }
+
*out = '\0';
+
/*
* We could skip pg_verifymbstr if we didn't process any non-7-bit-ASCII
* codes; but it's probably not worth the trouble, since this isn't