d69d45a5a changed how em_is_child members are stored in
EquivalenceClasses. Children are no longer stored in the ec_members
list. optimizer/README mentioned that most operations "should ignore
child members", but that felt a little untrue now since child members
are now stored in a separate place, they simply won't be found by the
normal means of looking (a foreach loop over ec_members), and if you don't
find them, there's technically no need to "ignore" them.
Here we tweak the wording slightly to reflect the new storage location
for child members.
Reported-by: Amit Langote <[email protected]>
Author: Amit Langote <
[email protected]>
Author: David Rowley <
[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqE8v=EuAP_3F_A2xn8zWx+nG_etW_Fe_DvKO-Fkx=+DdQ@mail.gmail.com
members are *not* full-fledged members of the EquivalenceClass and do not
affect the class's overall properties at all. They are kept only to
simplify matching of child-relation expressions to EquivalenceClasses.
-Most operations on EquivalenceClasses should ignore child members.
+Most operations on EquivalenceClasses needn't look at child members.
PathKeys