From ed762e94253d5dd7810da13b8dd802baa876c55e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:53:50 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Unify wording of user-facing "row security" messages. Row-level security is mostly referred to as "row security" in user-facing messages. Commit cd3c45125 introduced one inconsistent use of "row level security"; make that one match the rest. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250317.135305.573764276033358827.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com --- src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c index d947b2d2068..337e64a8a29 100644 --- a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c +++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ usage(const char *progname) printf(_(" --no-data do not restore data\n")); printf(_(" --no-data-for-failed-tables do not restore data of tables that could not be\n" " created\n")); - printf(_(" --no-policies do not restore row level security policies\n")); + printf(_(" --no-policies do not restore row security policies\n")); printf(_(" --no-publications do not restore publications\n")); printf(_(" --no-schema do not restore schema\n")); printf(_(" --no-security-labels do not restore security labels\n")); -- 2.30.2