On 20-02-2018 21:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marina Polyakova <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 20-02-2018 3:37, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> 4. Try to tweak the stats_ext.sql test conditions in some more
>>> refined
>>> way to get the test to pass everywhere. This'd be a lot of work with
>>> no guarantee of success, so I'm not too excited about it.
>
>> Thank you for your explanations! I'll try to do something in this
>> direction..
>
> OK. The least painful fix might be to establish a different work_mem
> setting just for that one query.
>
> However, if you're intent on putting work into continued support of
> --disable-float8-byval, I would *strongly* suggest setting up a
> buildfarm
> member that runs that way, because otherwise we're pretty much
> guaranteed
> to break it again.
Oh, thank you again!
> I continue to wonder if it's not better to just remove
> the option and thereby simplify our lives. What's the actual value of
> having it anymore?
I agree with you, but I have too little experience to vote for removing
this option.
--
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
