Hi!
Attached is a patch with corrections based on comments in previous
letters (I think these corrections are not final).
I'll be very grateful for feedbacks and bug reports.
11.04.2024 20:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> may be an attempt to merge into implicit
> pg_temp should fail just like CREATE TABLE ... PARTITION OF ... does?
Corrected. Result is:
\d+ s1.*
Table "s1.tp0"
...
Table "s1.tp1"
...
\d+ tp*
Did not find any relation named "tp*".
12.04.2024 4:53, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I think we shouldn't unconditionally copy schema name and
> relpersistence from the parent table. Instead we should throw the
> error on a mismatch like CREATE TABLE ... PARTITION OF ... does.
12.04.2024 5:20, Robert Haas wrote:
> We definitely shouldn't copy the schema name from the parent table.
Fixed.
12.04.2024 5:20, Robert Haas wrote:
> One of the things I dislike about this type of feature -- not this
> implementation specifically, but just this kind of idea in general --
> is that the syntax mentions a whole bunch of tables but in a way where
> you can't set their properties. Persistence, reloptions, whatever.
In next releases I want to allow specifying options (probably, first of
all, specifying tablespace of the partitions).
But before that, I would like to get a users reaction - what options
they really need?
--
With best regards,
Dmitry Koval
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com
