Re: postgres_fdw and skip locked - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Pyhalov
Subject Re: postgres_fdw and skip locked
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw and skip locked  (Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw and skip locked
List pgsql-hackers
Ashutosh Bapat писал 2022-02-16 16:40:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:23 PM Alexander Pyhalov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi.
>> 
>> Now select ... for update ... [skip locked|nowait] options are not
>> pushed down to remote servers. I see the only reason is that we can
>> speak to pre-9.5 server, which doesn't understand skip locked option.
>> Are there any other possible issues? Should we add foreign table 
>> option
>> to control this behavior?
> 
> Should we always push these clauses if remote server's version is
> newer than 9.5? There are quite a few options already. It will be good
> not to add one more.
> 
> I see that these options will work for all kinds of relations. So no
> problem if foreign table is pointing to something other than a table.

Hi.
The issue is that we perform deparsing while planing, we haven't 
connected to server yet.
Are there any ideas how to find out its version without specifying it, 
for example, in server options?
-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: support for CREATE MODULE
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: adding 'zstd' as a compression algorithm