Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jim Nasby <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I think a better option would be shoving it into a backend tuplestore and
> > just leaving it there (maybe with a command to clear it for the paranoid).
> > That gives a relation you can query against, insert into another table, etc.
>
> This is something I don't know how to do it: in my understanding, a
> tuplestore is an internal store, which means it has no name exposed.
> Thus we can't reference it later.
Yeah, that doesn't sound the kind of project you should attempt here.
EXPLAIN already knows to return tuples, so I was assuming you would
return your stuff using that mechanism.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
