On 20.11.2018 6:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:48:06AM +0500, Andrey Lepikhov wrote:
>> According to my experience, I clarify some comments to avoid this mistakes
>> in the future (see attachment).
>
> No objections from here.
>
>> - * The returned pointer (or *errormsg) points to an internal buffer that's
>> - * valid until the next call to XLogReadRecord.
>> + * The returned pointer (or *errormsg) points to an internal read-only buffer
>> + * that's valid until the next call to XLogReadRecord.
>
> Not sure that this bit adds much.
Ok
>
>> - /* Buffer for current ReadRecord result (expandable) */
>> + /*
>> + * Buffer for current ReadRecord result (expandable).
>> + * Used in the case, than current ReadRecord result don't fit on the
>> + * currently read WAL page.
>> + */
>
> Yeah, this one is not entirely true now. What about the following
> instead:
> - /* Buffer for current ReadRecord result (expandable) */
> + /*
> + * Buffer for current ReadRecord result (expandable), used when a record
> + * crosses a page boundary.
> + */
I agree
--
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
