On 25.03.2016 18:19, David Steele wrote:
> Hi Artur,
>
> On 3/20/16 10:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <[email protected]> writes:
>>> On Mar 20, 2016 01:09, "Dmitrii Golub" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Alex, actually subdomain can start with digit,
>>
>>> Not according to the RFC you have linked to.
>>
>> The powers-that-be relaxed that some time ago; I assume there's a newer
>> RFC. For instance, "163.com" is a real domain:
>
> You marked this patch "needs review" and then a few minutes later
> changed it to "waiting on author".
>
> If this was a mistake please change it back to "needs review". If you
> really are working on a new patch when can we expect that?
>
> Thanks,
Hi,
The previous patch is current, which can be commited.
I mark this patch as "needs review", because I noticed that the patch
was marked as "waiting on author". And I thought that I forgot to mark
as "need review".
But then I noticed that Robert Haas marked the patch as "waiting on
author" after my answer, and I returned "waiting on author". But I cant
find any questions or comments to me after my last answer.
Actually I think that this patch should be marked as "need review".
--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
