Thank you very much!
On 13-01-2018 21:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marina Polyakova <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 12-01-2018 21:00, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm ... so apparently, that compiler has bugs in handling nondefault
>>> alignment specs. You said upthread it was gcc, but what version
>>> exactly?
>
>> This is 5.2.0:
>
> Ugh ... protosciurus has 3.4.3, but I see that configure detects that
> as *not* having __int128. Probably what's happening on your machine
> is that gcc knows __int128 but generates buggy code for it when an
> alignment spec is given. So that's unfortunate, but it's not really
> a regression from 3.4.3.
>
> I'm not sure there's much we can do about this. Dropping the use
> of the alignment spec isn't a workable option. If there were a
> simple way for configure to detect that the compiler generates bad
> code for that, we could have it do so and reject use of __int128,
> but it'd be up to you to come up with a workable test.
I'll think about it..
> In the end this might just be an instance of the old saw about
> avoiding dot-zero releases. Have you tried a newer gcc?
> (Digging in their bugzilla finds quite a number of __int128 bugs
> fixed in 5.4.x, though none look to be specifically about
> misaligned data.)
As I was told offlist, 5.2.0 is already a fairly new version of gcc for
this system..
> Also, if it still happens with current gcc on that hardware,
> there'd be grounds for a new bug report to them.
--
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
