Hello, Thomas,
On 19/01/2024 01:35, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I don't yet have an opinion on the best way to
> do it though. Would it be enough to add emit_message($node, 0) after
> advance_out_of_record_splitting_zone()?
Yes, indeed that seems to be enough. At least I could not produce any
more "xl_tot_len zero" failures with that addition.
I like this solution the best.
> Tolerating the two different messages would weaken the test.
I agree, I also don't really like this option.
--
Anton Voloshin
Postgres Professional, The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru
