UPDATE operation terminates logical replication receiver process due to an assertion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject | UPDATE operation terminates logical replication receiver process due to an assertion |
Date | |
Msg-id | [email protected] Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: UPDATE operation terminates logical replication receiver process due to an assertion
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Dear all, I think I've found a problem in logical replication that was introduced recently in the patch: Fix calculation of which GENERATED columns need to be updated https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=3f7836ff651ad710fef52fa87b248ecdfc6468dc There is an assertion which accidentally terminates logical replication worker process. The assertion was introduced in the patch. To reproduce the problem Postgres should be compiled with enabled assertions. The problem appears when executing UPDATE operation on a non-empty table with GENERATED columns and a BEFORE UPDATE trigger. The problem seems to appear on the latest snapshots of 13 and 14 versions (sorry, I haven't tested other versions). Stack: ------ TRAP: FailedAssertion("relinfo->ri_GeneratedExprs != NULL", File: "execUtils.c", Line: 1292) postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (ExceptionalCondition+0x89)[0x55838760b902] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (ExecGetExtraUpdatedCols+0x90)[0x558387314bd8] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (ExecGetAllUpdatedCols+0x1c)[0x558387314c20] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (ExecUpdateLockMode+0x19)[0x558387306ce3] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (ExecBRUpdateTriggers+0xc7)[0x5583872debe8] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (ExecSimpleRelationUpdate+0x122)[0x55838730dca7] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x43d32f)[0x55838745632f] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x43e382)[0x558387457382] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x43e5d3)[0x5583874575d3] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x43e76b)[0x55838745776b] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (ApplyWorkerMain+0x3ac)[0x558387457e8b] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (StartBackgroundWorker+0x253)[0x5583874157ed] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x40e9c9)[0x5583874279c9] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x40eb43)[0x558387427b43] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x40fd28)[0x558387428d28] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x42520)[0x7f08cd44b520] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__select+0xbd)[0x7f08cd52474d] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (+0x410ceb)[0x558387429ceb] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (PostmasterMain+0xbf3)[0x55838742ac4d] postgres: logical replication worker for subscription 16401 (main+0x20c)[0x55838736076d] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x29d90)[0x7f08cd432d90] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x80)[0x7f08cd432e40] How to reproduce: ----------------- 1. Create master-replica configuration with enabled logical replication. The initial schema is shown below: CREATE TABLE gtest26 ( a int PRIMARY KEY, b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) STORED ); CREATE FUNCTION gtest_trigger_func() RETURNS trigger LANGUAGE plpgsql AS $$ BEGIN IF tg_op IN ('DELETE', 'UPDATE') THEN RAISE INFO '%: %: old = %', TG_NAME, TG_WHEN, OLD; END IF; IF tg_op IN ('INSERT', 'UPDATE') THEN RAISE INFO '%: %: new = %', TG_NAME, TG_WHEN, NEW; END IF; IF tg_op = 'DELETE' THEN RETURN OLD; ELSE RETURN NEW; END IF; END $$; CREATE TRIGGER gtest1 BEFORE DELETE OR UPDATE ON gtest26 FOR EACH ROW WHEN (OLD.b < 0) -- ok EXECUTE PROCEDURE gtest_trigger_func(); INSERT INTO gtest26(a) values (-2), (0), (3) 2. The problem appears if to execute the following sql on the master node: UPDATE gtest26 SET a = a + 1; I'm not sure that this assertion is the proper one and how to properly fix the issue. That's why I'm asking for some help of the community. Thank you in advance. With best regards, Vitaly
pgsql-hackers by date: