Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Luzanov
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <[email protected]>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

I found that the 'standalone backend' backend type is not documented 
right now.
Adding something like (from commit message) would be helpful:

Both the bootstrap backend and single user mode backends will have 
backend_type STANDALONE_BACKEND.

-- 
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode