Discussion of PostgreSQL's performance issues. Please see Guide to reporting problems and Slow Query Questions for some tips on how to write your performance question.
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Refresh materialized view vs recreate | Антон Мазунин | 06:26 |
Re: Refresh materialized view vs recreate | Kevin Grittner | 15:25 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Perf decreased although server is better | Benjamin Toueg | 13:26 |
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Tomas Vondra | 14:36 |
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Kevin Grittner | 14:38 |
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Rick Otten | 14:55 |
no MCV list of tiny table with unique columns | Justin Pryzby | 18:53 |
archive_command too slow. | Joao Junior | 19:06 |
Re: no MCV list of tiny table with unique columns | Tom Lane | 20:05 |
Re: no MCV list of tiny table with unique columns | Justin Pryzby | 20:19 |
Re: limit 1 on view never finishes | Jim Nasby | 23:37 |
Re: query slowdown after 9.0 -> 9.4 migration | Jim Nasby | 23:43 |
Re: Big Memory Boxes and pgtune | Jim Nasby | 23:46 |
Re: no MCV list of tiny table with unique columns | Tom Lane | 23:48 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Benjamin Toueg | 14:51 |
Hot migration of tables | YueLi | 18:07 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Kevin Grittner | 00:05 |
Re: Big Memory Boxes and pgtune | Scott Marlowe | 02:24 |
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Benjamin Toueg | 11:53 |
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Will Platnick | 13:27 |
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Rick Otten | 13:29 |
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Kevin Grittner | 14:05 |
Re: archive_command too slow. | Jeff Janes | 16:19 |
Re: archive_command too slow. | Claudio Freire | 22:30 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: no MCV list of tiny table with unique columns | Justin Pryzby | 22:36 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Query much slower after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Adam Brusselback | 15:52 |
Re: Query much slower after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Adam Brusselback | 18:05 |
Re: Query much slower after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Tom Lane | 19:16 |
Re: Query much slower after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Adam Brusselback | 19:26 |
Re: Query much slower after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Tom Lane | 19:32 |
Re: Query much slower after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Adam Brusselback | 20:31 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: archive_command too slow. | Stephen Frost | 15:47 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Tuning one Recurcive CTE | Henrik Ekenberg | 13:05 |
Re: Tuning one Recurcive CTE | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 13:29 |
Re: Tuning one Recurcive CTE | Henrik Ekenberg | 14:30 |
Re: Tuning one Recurcive CTE | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 16:22 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Perf decreased although server is better | Benjamin Toueg | 09:52 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | [email protected] | 06:54 |
Re: Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | Marc Mamin | 12:43 |
Any advice tuning this query ? | Henrik Ekenberg | 15:19 |
Re: Any advice tuning this query ? | Devrim Gündüz | 15:55 |
Re: Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | [email protected] | 16:14 |
Re: Any advice tuning this query ? | Andreas Karlsson | 16:22 |
Re: Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | Tom Lane | 16:46 |
Re: Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | Jeff Janes | 23:32 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | [email protected] | 00:41 |
Re: Any advice tuning this query ? | Jeff Janes | 19:25 |
Re: Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | Tom Lane | 19:59 |
Re: Inlining of functions (doing LIKE on an array) | [email protected] | 20:17 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Some tuning suggestions on a Red Hat 6.7 - PG 9.5.3 production environment | Pietro Pugni | 11:45 |
Query planner chooses index scan backward instead of better index option | Seckin Pulatkan | 12:01 |
Re: Query planner chooses index scan backward instead of better index option | Jeff Janes | 16:50 |
Re: Some tuning suggestions on a Red Hat 6.7 - PG 9.5.3 production environment | domenico febbo | 17:36 |
Why is the optimiser choosing a sub-optimal plan? | Stephen Cresswell | 17:53 |
Re: Why is the optimiser choosing a sub-optimal plan? | Tom Lane | 19:37 |
Re: Some tuning suggestions on a Red Hat 6.7 - PG 9.5.3 production environment | Pietro Pugni | 20:50 |
Re: Some tuning suggestions on a Red Hat 6.7 - PG 9.5.3 production environment | Merlin Moncure | 21:24 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Query planner chooses index scan backward instead of better index option | Seckin Pulatkan | 08:44 |
Sql Query :: Any advice ? | Henrik Ekenberg | 13:27 |
Re: Sql Query :: Any advice ? | vinny | 13:50 |
Re: Sql Query :: Any advice ? | Henrik Ekenberg | 14:30 |
Re: Sql Query :: Any advice ? | vinny | 15:44 |
Re: Sql Query :: Any advice ? 📎 | Henrik | 17:23 |
Performance decrease after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Gabriela Serventi | 21:57 |
Re: Performance decrease after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Tom Lane | 22:35 |
Re: Some tuning suggestions on a Red Hat 6.7 - PG 9.5.3 production environment | Jeff Janes | 23:47 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Performance decrease after upgrade to 9.6.1 | Gabriela Serventi | 00:50 |
Run one query and execution time is very different | Metatrader EA | 09:10 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Query hangs sometimes | Metatrader EA | 10:43 |
Re: Query hangs sometimes | Guillaume Cottenceau | 11:02 |
Re: Query hangs sometimes | Metatrader EA | 11:55 |
Re: Query planner chooses index scan backward instead of better index option | Seckin Pulatkan | 12:33 |
materialized view order by and clustering | Rick Otten | 16:36 |
Re: materialized view order by and clustering | David G. Johnston | 17:06 |
Re: Query hangs sometimes | Michael Paquier | 21:49 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
DO I miss something ? | Metatrader EA | 13:52 |
Re: DO I miss something ? | vinny | 14:04 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
How to tune Postgres to take advantage of 256GB RAM hardware | Carmen Mardiros | 22:15 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: How to tune Postgres to take advantage of 256GB RAM hardware | Andreas Kretschmer | 04:19 |
Re: How to tune Postgres to take advantage of 256GB RAM hardware | Carmen Mardiros | 08:17 |
Re: How to tune Postgres to take advantage of 256GB RAM hardware | Imre Samu | 11:46 |
Re: How to tune Postgres to take advantage of 256GB RAM hardware | Carmen Mardiros | 15:31 |
Re: How to tune Postgres to take advantage of 256GB RAM hardware | Tom Lane | 18:40 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Re: Millions of tables | Robert Klemme | 17:14 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
Slow UPDATE in logs that's usually fast | Aldo Sarmiento | 05:13 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
can trigger monitor two tables? | zhangkai.gis | 08:59 |
Re: can trigger monitor two tables? | Andreas Kretschmer | 10:49 |
Thread | Author | Time |
---|---|---|
performance issue with bitmap index scans on huge amounts of big jsonb documents | Marc-Olaf Jaschke | 12:26 |