Linear Analysis
The interface described here is currently experimental and at any time subject to breaking changes not respecting semantic versioning.
Linear analysis refers to the process of linearizing a nonlinear model and analysing the resulting linear dynamical system. To facilitate linear analysis, ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary provides the concept of an AnalysisPoint
, which can be inserted in-between two causal blocks (such as those from the Blocks
sub module). Once a model containing analysis points is built, several operations are available:
get_sensitivity
get the sensitivity function (wiki), $S(s)$, as defined in the field of control theory.get_comp_sensitivity
get the complementary sensitivity function $T(s) : S(s)+T(s)=1$.get_looptransfer
get the (open) loop-transfer function where the loop starts and ends in the analysis point. For a typical simple feedback connection with a plant $P(s)$ and a controller $C(s)$, the loop-transfer function at the plant output is $P(s)C(s)$.linearize
can be called with two analysis points denoting the input and output of the linearized system.open_loop
return a new (nonlinear) system where the loop has been broken in the analysis point, i.e., the connection the analysis point usually implies has been removed.
An analysis point can be created explicitly using the constructor AnalysisPoint
, or automatically when connecting two causal components using connect
:
connect(comp1.output, :analysis_point_name, comp2.input)
Analysis points are causal, i.e., they imply a directionality for the flow of information. The order of the connections in the connect statement is thus important, i.e., connect(out, :name, in)
is different from connect(in, :name, out)
.
The directionality of an analysis point can be thought of as an arrow in a block diagram, where the name of the analysis point applies to the arrow itself.
┌─────┐ ┌─────┐
│ │ name │ │
│ out├────────►│in │
│ │ │ │
└─────┘ └─────┘
This is signified by the name being the middle argument to connect
.
Of the above mentioned functions, all except for open_loop
return the output of ModelingToolkit.linearize
, which is
matrices, simplified_sys = linearize(...)
# matrices = (; A, B, C, D)
i.e., matrices
is a named tuple containing the matrices of a linear state-space system on the form
\[\begin{aligned} \dot x &= Ax + Bu\\ y &= Cx + Du \end{aligned}\]
Example
The following example builds a simple closed-loop system with a plant $P$ and a controller $C$. Two analysis points are inserted, one before and one after $P$. We then derive a number of sensitivity functions and show the corresponding code using the package ControlSystemBase.jl
using ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.Blocks, ModelingToolkit
@named P = FirstOrder(k = 1, T = 1) # A first-order system with pole in -1
@named C = Gain(-1) # A P controller
t = ModelingToolkit.get_iv(P)
eqs = [connect(P.output, :plant_output, C.input) # Connect with an automatically created analysis point called :plant_output
connect(C.output, :plant_input, P.input)]
sys = ODESystem(eqs, t, systems = [P, C], name = :feedback_system)
matrices_S = get_sensitivity(sys, :plant_input)[1] # Compute the matrices of a state-space representation of the (input)sensitivity function.
matrices_T = get_comp_sensitivity(sys, :plant_input)[1]
(A = [-2.0;;], B = [-1.0;;], C = [-1.0;;], D = [0.0;;])
Continued linear analysis and design can be performed using ControlSystemsBase.jl. We create ControlSystemsBase.StateSpace
objects using
using ControlSystemsBase, Plots
S = ss(matrices_S...)
T = ss(matrices_T...)
bodeplot([S, T], lab = ["S" "" "T" ""], plot_title = "Bode plot of sensitivity functions",
margin = 5Plots.mm)
The sensitivity functions obtained this way should be equivalent to the ones obtained with the code below
using ControlSystemsBase
P = tf(1.0, [1, 1]) |> ss
C = 1 # Negative feedback assumed in ControlSystems
S = sensitivity(P, C) # or feedback(1, P*C)
T = comp_sensitivity(P, C) # or feedback(P*C)
ControlSystemsBase.StateSpace{ControlSystemsBase.Continuous, Float64}
A =
-2.0
B =
1.0
C =
1.0
D =
0.0
Continuous-time state-space model
We may also derive the loop-transfer function $L(s) = P(s)C(s)$ using
matrices_L = get_looptransfer(sys, :plant_output)[1]
L = ss(matrices_L...)
ControlSystemsBase.StateSpace{ControlSystemsBase.Continuous, Float64}
A =
-1.0
B =
-1.0
C =
1.0
D =
0.0
Continuous-time state-space model
which is equivalent to the following with ControlSystems
L = P * (-C) # Add the minus sign to build the negative feedback into the controller
ControlSystemsBase.StateSpace{ControlSystemsBase.Continuous, Float64}
A =
-1.0
B =
-1.0
C =
1.0
D =
-0.0
Continuous-time state-space model
To obtain the transfer function between two analysis points, we call linearize
matrices_PS = linearize(sys, :plant_input, :plant_output)[1]
(A = [-2.0;;], B = [1.0;;], C = [1.0;;], D = [0.0;;])
this particular transfer function should be equivalent to the linear system P(s)S(s)
, i.e., equivalent to
feedback(P, C)
ControlSystemsBase.StateSpace{ControlSystemsBase.Continuous, Float64}
A =
-2.0
B =
1.0
C =
1.0
D =
0.0
Continuous-time state-space model
Obtaining transfer functions
A statespace system from ControlSystemsBase can be converted to a transfer function using the function tf
:
tf(S)
ControlSystemsBase.TransferFunction{ControlSystemsBase.Continuous, ControlSystemsBase.SisoRational{Float64}}
1.0s + 1.0
----------
1.0s + 2.0
Continuous-time transfer function model
Gain and phase margins
Further linear analysis can be performed using the analysis methods from ControlSystemsBase. For example, calculating the gain and phase margins of a system can be done using
margin(P)
(wgm = [NaN;;], gm = [Inf;;], wpm = [NaN;;], pm = [Inf;;])
(they are infinite for this system). A Nyquist plot can be produced using
nyquistplot(P)
Index
ModelingToolkit.linearize
— Function(; A, B, C, D), simplified_sys = linearize(sys, inputs, outputs; t=0.0, op = Dict(), allow_input_derivatives = false, zero_dummy_der=false, kwargs...)
(; A, B, C, D) = linearize(simplified_sys, lin_fun; t=0.0, op = Dict(), allow_input_derivatives = false, zero_dummy_der=false)
Linearize sys
between inputs
and outputs
, both vectors of variables. Return a NamedTuple with the matrices of a linear statespace representation on the form
\[\begin{aligned} ẋ &= Ax + Bu\\ y &= Cx + Du \end{aligned}\]
The first signature automatically calls linearization_function
internally, while the second signature expects the outputs of linearization_function
as input.
op
denotes the operating point around which to linearize. If none is provided, the default values of sys
are used.
If allow_input_derivatives = false
, an error will be thrown if input derivatives ($u̇$) appear as inputs in the linearized equations. If input derivatives are allowed, the returned B
matrix will be of double width, corresponding to the input [u; u̇]
.
zero_dummy_der
can be set to automatically set the operating point to zero for all dummy derivatives.
See also linearization_function
which provides a lower-level interface, linearize_symbolic
and ModelingToolkit.reorder_unknowns
.
See extended help for an example.
The implementation and notation follows that of "Linear Analysis Approach for Modelica Models", Allain et al. 2009
Extended help
This example builds the following feedback interconnection and linearizes it from the input of F
to the output of P
.
r ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐
───►│ ├──────►│ │ u │ │
│ F │ │ C ├────►│ P │ y
└─────┘ ┌►│ │ │ ├─┬─►
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────┘
using ModelingToolkit
using ModelingToolkit: t_nounits as t, D_nounits as D
function plant(; name)
@variables x(t) = 1
@variables u(t)=0 y(t)=0
eqs = [D(x) ~ -x + u
y ~ x]
ODESystem(eqs, t; name = name)
end
function ref_filt(; name)
@variables x(t)=0 y(t)=0
@variables u(t)=0 [input = true]
eqs = [D(x) ~ -2 * x + u
y ~ x]
ODESystem(eqs, t, name = name)
end
function controller(kp; name)
@variables y(t)=0 r(t)=0 u(t)=0
@parameters kp = kp
eqs = [
u ~ kp * (r - y),
]
ODESystem(eqs, t; name = name)
end
@named f = ref_filt()
@named c = controller(1)
@named p = plant()
connections = [f.y ~ c.r # filtered reference to controller reference
c.u ~ p.u # controller output to plant input
p.y ~ c.y]
@named cl = ODESystem(connections, t, systems = [f, c, p])
lsys0, ssys = linearize(cl, [f.u], [p.x])
desired_order = [f.x, p.x]
lsys = ModelingToolkit.reorder_unknowns(lsys0, unknowns(ssys), desired_order)
@assert lsys.A == [-2 0; 1 -2]
@assert lsys.B == [1; 0;;]
@assert lsys.C == [0 1]
@assert lsys.D[] == 0
## Symbolic linearization
lsys_sym, _ = ModelingToolkit.linearize_symbolic(cl, [f.u], [p.x])
@assert substitute(lsys_sym.A, ModelingToolkit.defaults(cl)) == lsys.A