Skip to content

Commit befd86b

Browse files
author
Steve Krouse
committed
added JE meeting ntoes 11/21/18
1 parent bbe3c6a commit befd86b

File tree

1 file changed

+79
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+79
-0
lines changed

notes/jonathan-edwards/11-21-18.md

Lines changed: 79 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
1+
---
2+
title: JE Meeting 11/21/18
3+
---
4+
5+
## JE meeting 11/21/18
6+
7+
* TOC
8+
{: toc }
9+
10+
### Recap
11+
12+
Instead of jumping right into drawing more "ideal worlds", I was struck by a few thoughts:
13+
14+
1. Sean McDirmid was skeptical of my diagnosis of the key hard parts of Reflex
15+
2. You mentioned dogfooding so I wondered what the best approximation of it was to build something better
16+
3. I wanted to get a better sense of the framework before building abstractions on top of it
17+
18+
So my idea was to try and set up a better Haskell/Reflex experience, film myself building things, and then write down complaints. I wasn't able to get a better experience (crazy!) so I went ahead and made a list of key complaints and some next step ideas...
19+
20+
https://futureofcoding.org/log#biggest-experience-problems-with-haskellreflex
21+
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/SthuNcU5N3niEn9UUGqlIcDdFMFZFLB5gkiK3ywG0Qay3-KdKlD6OtP90RzP835NqQBVkxOTxrVd16sTQ9eR7jFtQJe0jYH5tK8wXycATlfSwixxg-G6_RWN5WoTJyvZjm_vTpCjQp6B9ugUUFloLIOGQN7aFeWAgbUGY-zzPBxO8MRvV6bJTHHivLwoibJPcmQ32gVcf1gNe2EHz4ft7brr-sRt4z3AC_MQVGKNf3Q0EWVoVFP2wmrFm27ef8ElzN88DPBvNqW5YSvnO-7PSh5pnIKr3RG9egjVmof4KfhlWqFpj7E-nUQrSS8AQSfr8zWj1TG3A7umVBoDVUnwXyRY9OmJspKuNN5YJ2NKZZJFQsmvbqVpygIyN1uQICY-4aDoYZlza3VbMEolnaWdDqehP-sVBmWla55BT5kGvGncUovc_ZI8Y6xe9a-ndt-MqBZt47VY4Vvg2HT-PGb0va39FSQcdt3SWnF3Dz9JxJUpCG_wAsk8gpqZrl9PaiYm749ftEzscpdKhVFxEfUlSxUMPwkC1tfeCelT3vzCyDXw1Zg4Gz_nPokfZzZzUCnA3ffLyiB3k4yfFWnD7ojdVINcgipFKC6mWZFG9M8fG5VPXiwNMttDlUwqXEDkvFbgOU2Uvb7ss_HJDtz8MqMEVoW4eg=w1920-h775-no)
22+
23+
### drawing ideas
24+
25+
* maybe livestream it somehow to encourage me to actually do it?
26+
* think more precisely abstractlbetter distinguish my "vision" from exsiting Haskell alternatives (lamdu, luna, isomorf)
27+
* the idea of never being able to "delete" anything, nor stop it from running
28+
* the idea of hashed expressions, particularly with scope
29+
* exploring which concepts we can move from the language compiler to the editor (no free variables, type inference is just local if not just a type "suggestion")
30+
31+
### Next steps
32+
33+
* p4 next steps
34+
* read the first 6 chapters of TaPL
35+
* draw out what a better time would look like
36+
* schedule JE podcast
37+
38+
### notes from JE
39+
40+
* they have generators in JS so maybe we have laziness and also weak refs maybe
41+
* TODO ask ryan trinkle
42+
* building a langauge is a lot but a JS framework is great
43+
* people would immediately download and play with it
44+
* interpreting haskell seems like a lot of work
45+
* starting from the top (the UI like aprt.us) is good
46+
* could start from a DSL for the streams --> maybe a macro thing for JS or a little lang with syntax and a parser with embedded JS
47+
* he's skeptical of the Xerox parc advice to build one's own infrastructure to build what you want on top
48+
* imagining UI is a pain but implementing is weeks or months of work, but a DSL can give you great sense of the UI and so much easier to build
49+
* the risks with this is that you'll go with things that are good on paper but hard to visualize
50+
* tons of DSL tools: spoofax, MPS, look into this for JS
51+
* strongly recommends typescript
52+
* there's a lot of work on "functional typescript" and some even have typeclasses!
53+
* subtext in the past has been "parametric in my mind", living in multiple places in the design space
54+
55+
56+
### His work
57+
58+
* minimum viable paradigm
59+
* maybe someone will steal it if it's communicated well enough
60+
* maybe people would join as contributors and could work on parts
61+
* classically, research is stealing idea -- not working with you
62+
* people who cite me is for "inspiration" and I don't get cited in actual research yet because they are not solid enough --> like how Eve inspired Apple
63+
* ultimate goal is to have an impact and what's the best way of doing that?
64+
* I've always avoided making design commitments but now it feels good to settle down
65+
* think on a time to do a work retreat with JE, maybe Sarah will come
66+
* reminder that PX deadline Feb 1
67+
68+
69+
<script>
70+
71+
(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){
72+
(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),
73+
m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)
74+
})(window,document,'script','https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');
75+
76+
ga('create', 'UA-103157758-1', 'auto');
77+
ga('send', 'pageview');
78+
79+
</script>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)