Skip to content

Make strategic function application operators handle strategies correctly #61

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2024
Merged

Make strategic function application operators handle strategies correctly #61

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2024

Conversation

konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #43.

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@simonmar what do you think?

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@simonmar ?

@konsumlamm konsumlamm mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2023
Closed
@konsumlamm konsumlamm mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2023
Closed
@Kleidukos Kleidukos requested a review from treeowl January 19, 2024 15:48
treeowl
treeowl approved these changes Jan 19, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@treeowl treeowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Kleidukos do you still want to review or can I go ahead and merge?

Kleidukos
Kleidukos approved these changes Jan 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Kleidukos Kleidukos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@konsumlamm konsumlamm merged commit b60237e into haskell:master Jan 21, 2024
@konsumlamm konsumlamm deleted the strategic-operators branch January 21, 2024 20:21
konsumlamm added a commit to treeowl/parallel that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
@konsumlamm
Make strategic function application operators handle strategies corre…
f29c963 
…ctly (haskell#61)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@treeowl treeowl treeowl approved these changes

@Kleidukos Kleidukos Kleidukos approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Strategic function application operators don't quite match their documentation
3 participants
@konsumlamm @treeowl @Kleidukos