Skip to content

[OpenMP] Mark 'map-type modifiers in arbitrary position' done #133906

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

jtb20
Copy link
Contributor

@jtb20 jtb20 commented Apr 1, 2025

I think #90499 already implements support for the listed OpenMP 6.0 feature mentioned in the title. This patch just marks it done (for C/C++).

I think PR90499 already implements support for the listed OpenMP
6.0 feature mentioned in the title.  This patch just marks it done
(for C/C++).
@jtb20 jtb20 requested review from alexey-bataev and jyu2-git April 1, 2025 12:52
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ implementation.
+-------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ref modifier for map clauses | :none:`unclaimed` | :none:`unclaimed` | |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| map-type modifiers in arbitrary position | :none:`unclaimed` | :none:`unclaimed` | |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could add a reference to the patch?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought I had! The link to '#90499' in the fourth table column.

@jtb20 jtb20 merged commit c1ada72 into llvm:main Apr 3, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants