Skip to content

BUG: don't raise on empty usecols #13402

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gfyoung
Copy link
Member

@gfyoung gfyoung commented Jun 8, 2016

Title is self-explanatory.

@gfyoung gfyoung force-pushed the empty-usecols-bug branch from 43a5f72 to 8eed8d1 Compare June 8, 2016 16:07
@jreback jreback added Error Reporting Incorrect or improved errors from pandas IO CSV read_csv, to_csv labels Jun 8, 2016
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.18.2 milestone Jun 8, 2016
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Jun 8, 2016

yep this fine. ping on green.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 84.23%

Merging #13402 into master will increase coverage by <.01%

@@             master     #13402   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           138        138          
  Lines         50805      50805          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
+ Hits          42795      42796     +1   
+ Misses         8010       8009     -1   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by d405bf2...8eed8d1

@gfyoung
Copy link
Member Author

gfyoung commented Jun 8, 2016

@jreback: Travis is giving the green light. Ready to merge if there are no concerns.

@jreback jreback closed this in 3eb4784 Jun 9, 2016
@gfyoung gfyoung deleted the empty-usecols-bug branch June 9, 2016 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Error Reporting Incorrect or improved errors from pandas IO CSV read_csv, to_csv
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants