Skip to content

initdb error #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
digoal opened this issue May 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

initdb error #2

digoal opened this issue May 17, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@digoal
Copy link

digoal commented May 17, 2018

git checkout conn_pool
and compile it

but initdb error

initdb -D $PGDATA -U postgres -E UTF8 --locale=C -X /data01/pg/pg_wal_4001

The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "digoal".
This user must also own the server process.

The database cluster will be initialized with locale "C".
The default text search configuration will be set to "english".

Data page checksums are disabled.

creating directory /data01/pg/pg_root4001 ... ok
creating directory /data01/pg/pg_wal_4001 ... ok
creating subdirectories ... ok
selecting default max_connections ... 100
selecting default shared_buffers ... 128MB
selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix
creating configuration files ... ok
running bootstrap script ... 2018-05-17 16:23:06.783 CST [43167] FATAL:  index access method handler function 330 did not return an IndexAmRoutine struct
2018-05-17 16:23:06.783 CST [43167] PANIC:  cannot abort transaction 1, it was already committed
child process was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
initdb: removing data directory "/data01/pg/pg_root4001"
initdb: removing WAL directory "/data01/pg/pg_wal_4001"
@knizhnik
Copy link

Sorry, which OS and compiler your are using?
Con you provide me complete information about how your are building Postgres?

@digoal
Copy link
Author

digoal commented May 17, 2018

CentOS 7.4 x64

@knizhnik
Copy link

My be it is related with #3 - I am not sure which sources you are using...

@digoal
Copy link
Author

digoal commented May 21, 2018

it's my mistake, sorry.

@digoal digoal closed this as completed May 21, 2018
knizhnik pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2019
The original setup for dependencies of partitioned objects had
serious problems:

1. It did not verify that a drop cascading to a partition-child object
also cascaded to at least one of the object's partition parents.  Now,
normally a child object would share all its dependencies with one or
another parent (e.g. a child index's opclass dependencies would be shared
with the parent index), so that this oversight is usually harmless.
But if some dependency failed to fit this pattern, the child could be
dropped while all its parents remain, creating a logically broken
situation.  (It's easy to construct artificial cases that break it,
such as attaching an unrelated extension dependency to the child object
and then dropping the extension.  I'm not sure if any less-artificial
cases exist.)

2. Management of partition dependencies during ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION
was complicated and buggy; for example, after detaching a partition
table it was possible to create cases where a formerly-child index
should be dropped and was not, because the correct set of dependencies
had not been reconstructed.

Less seriously, because multiple partition relationships were
represented identically in pg_depend, there was an order-of-traversal
dependency on which partition parent was cited in error messages.
We also had some pre-existing order-of-traversal hazards for error
messages related to internal and extension dependencies.  This is
cosmetic to users but causes testing problems.

To fix #1, add a check at the end of the partition tree traversal
to ensure that at least one partition parent got deleted.  To fix #2,
establish a new policy that partition dependencies are in addition to,
not instead of, a child object's usual dependencies; in this way
ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION need not cope with adding or removing the
usual dependencies.

To fix the cosmetic problem, distinguish between primary and secondary
partition dependency entries in pg_depend, by giving them different
deptypes.  (They behave identically except for having different
priorities for being cited in error messages.)  This means that the
former 'I' dependency type is replaced with new 'P' and 'S' types.

This also fixes a longstanding bug that after handling an internal
dependency by recursing to the owning object, findDependentObjects
did not verify that the current target was now scheduled for deletion,
and did not apply the current recursion level's objflags to it.
Perhaps that should be back-patched; but in the back branches it
would only matter if some concurrent transaction had removed the
internal-linkage pg_depend entry before the recursive call found it,
or the recursive call somehow failed to find it, both of which seem
unlikely.

Catversion bump because the contents of pg_depend change for
partitioning relationships.

Patch HEAD only.  It's annoying that we're not fixing #2 in v11,
but there seems no practical way to do so given that the problem
is exactly a poor choice of what entries to put in pg_depend.
We can't really fix that while staying compatible with what's
in pg_depend in existing v11 installations.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzkypv1R+teZrr71U23J578NnTBt2X8+Y=Odr4pOdW1rXg@mail.gmail.com
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants