-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Update legibility of formula to proper Latex Format #4390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update legibility of formula to proper Latex Format #4390
Conversation
* Update function to latex * Add hyperlink
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4390 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.04% 88.04%
=======================================
Files 88 88
Lines 14482 14482
=======================================
Hits 12750 12750
Misses 1732 1732 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @CloudChaoszero
Instead of writing where\mu=0
, would it work to use the vertical "evaluated at" line (https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/40160/math-symbol-question-vertical-bar-for-evaluated-at)?
Finally, I think the *
sign, and the brackets around 2*\pi
could be removed
@MarcoGorelli Sounds great. Made the update, seen below |
Thanks, looks good, but I think you'll want the vertical "evaluated at" line after the third operand, not after the fourth one Also, could you address
Finally, there's a linting error due to trailing whitespace, could you resolve that please? See the style guide for how to run the checks, and feel free to ask if it's unclear |
@MarcoGorelli , Ah, thanks for the tip--found and deleted the whitespace. Moreover, I resolved the following & 'evaluated at' piece.
|
Thanks @CloudChaoszero! |
Description
Note: Added mid-step just to clarify why the PDF is resulted, as such.
Closes #4384
Output
From
We get
