Fix minor typos

[canyon289]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5110 (041e21d) into main (05aa247) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5110   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.81%   77.81%           
=======================================
  Files          87       87           
  Lines       14008    14008           
=======================================
  Hits        10900    10900           
  Misses       3108     3108           

[canyon289]

Noticing theres other small fixes needed here. Marking WIP till I can get to them all later

[canyon289]

Alright were good now

[michaelosthege]

I must say I'm not a fan of not mentioning version numbers and just going with the "PyMC" vs. "PyMC3" distinction.

A sentence such as

This is effectively the PyMC replacement for Distribution.random.

could easily confuse someone who is not aware that there once was a "PyMC3" and that the lack of the 3 indicates that pymc >=4 is meant.

Maybe we can instead try to mention v3 explicitly like this?

This is effectively the replacement of the old Distribution.random API from v3.x.

[aloctavodia]

I agree with @michaelosthege we should not make a distinction between PyMC3 and PyMC, there is only one project/software/package/tool and that is PyMC. If we want to contrast features from different versions we should explicitly use the version numbers like 3.x vs 4.x or <4.0, etc

[canyon289]

Ok! Will update

[ricardoV94]

@canyon289 Can we merge this or are there any other changes you had in mind?

[canyon289]

Ah I see we merged this, was going to update based on discussion in our lab meeting. Noting that within our community we still are unclear about how to refer to the distinctions of PyMC

Between subsets of us we still use

• PyMC vs PyMC3
• PyMC 4.x vs PyMC 3.x (and drop PyMC3 altogether)
• PyMC V4 vs PyMC V3 (and drop PyMC3 altogether)