Allow `delete=False` for tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()

[JakobDev]

Feature or enhancement

If you use tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(), the directory is automagically deleted, what is the whole purpose of this class. But sometimes you may want to take a look at it for debugging reasons, so it would be nice to have a delete=False to prevent deleting.

Pitch

Code using this could look like this:

import argparse
import tempfile


def main():
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
    parser.add_argument("--keep-temp-files", action="store_true", help="Don't delete temporary files")
    args = parser.parse_args()

    with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(delete=not args.keep_temp_files) as tempdir:
        # Do something

        if args.keep_temp_files:
            print(f"You can view your temporary files at {tempdir}")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

I personal use tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() a lot, especial in build scripts. Sometimes a need to take a look at the content of these. so having this Option would be great for that.

Other ways to achieve this

Of course, there would be other ways to achieve this.

1. Use a extra function that takes the directory as argument:

if args.keep_temp_files:
    do_something("some/other/dir")
else:
    with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tempdir:
        do_something(tempfile)

This would need some code rewrite.

2. Using input()

with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tempdir:
    # Do something

    if args.keep_temp_files:
        print(f"You can view your temporary files at {tempdir}. Press enter to delete the files.")
        breakpoint()

This could cause problems in situations, where you can't easily give some Keyboard input to TTY.

3. Using a custom function

def my_temp_dir(delet: bool = false):
    if delete:
        return tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
    else:
        return my_custom_handler()

This will blow up your code when you just write a simple script. Python also often used by beginners, which may don't know, they can do this and start refactoring their code.

Why you should implement this

The argument can be easy added to exiting scripts if needed, without any additional work. A scripting language like Python should allow this to make debug more easy and more beginner friendly.

It is absolutely no work to implement this. If this would be much work to implement and maintain this, I would not suggested it. But in this case, it's just 3 steeps:

1. Take a additional argument in __init__():
2. Save is as class attribute
3. In __exit__() ask, if it should delete or not

Previous discussion

None

Linked PRs

• gh-100131: Add optional delete parameter to tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() #100132

[CAM-Gerlach]

See #69212 for the previous issue on this. FWIW, I was +/- 0 at the time, as I'd solved one of the previously-stated use cases in a cleaner fashion in #74168 , but I've come around to this idea as there are several other use cases for it presented there.

[serhiy-storchaka]

Just use mkdtemp().

The purpose of the context manager is automatic deletion of the directory when you leave the block. If you do not need this, you do not need a contect manager.

[graingert]

there's one additional way to archive this:

with (
    contextlib.nullcontext(tempfile.mkdtemp())
    if args.keep_temp_files
    else tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
) as dir:
    do_something(dir)

[JakobDev]

Just use mkdtemp().

The purpose of the context manager is automatic deletion of the directory when you leave the block. If you do not need this, you do not need a contect manager.

I know that. The tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() is used for exactly that purpose. But sometimes, you need to debug a code that uses the context manager. So this Feature Request just adds for a Way to disable the normal behaviour ( using a breakpoint is not always possible/practical) , so you you can do your debugging stuff without doing much code rewrite and after that, you just remove the delete=False. This is not meant to be used, when you permanently don't want to delete the temp directory.

there's one additional way to archive this:

This is not suitable, if you are not a Python expert

[gpshead]

I'm going to close this based on Serhiy's practical mkdtemp() suggestion above. We've already got one way to do this.

[zware]

The point of TemporaryDirectory is to make handling the lifecycle of a temporary directory convenient. There are other ways to achieve the desired result, but it's hard to call any of them convenient.

[CAM-Gerlach]

FWIW, given the basic stated motivation for this feature, both on this issue and the previous one, is cases in which the cleanup may or may not be required, the decent number of users who presented similar use case, it's not clear to me how "just use mkdtemp" is a good solution for that.

Sure, there are workarounds, but the OP illustrates the issues with each, and in summary the obvious ones are kludgy and the non-kludgy ones are not obvious. It also seems like it could increase the chance users reach for the more cryptic lower-level interfaces for the other cases where the higher-level one would be safer, simpler and more ergonomic.

In light of the fact that the code changes to the stdlib are relatively minimal, and there's an up to date PR with tests and docs provided, I'm inclined to agree with @zware that this change shouldn't be rejected on that basis.

[gpshead]

fair enough. I really don't think this feature will see much use, but I've used the PR to improve the docstring anyways.