Skip to content

gh-124127: Make Py_REFCNT() opaque in limited C API 3.14 #124128

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Sep 16, 2024

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

cc @serhiy-storchaka

@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

I plan to merge this change at the end of the week, unless someone wants to review it or has concerns about it.

Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, with a nitpick on the implementation:

}
#if !defined(Py_LIMITED_API) || Py_LIMITED_API+0 < 0x030b0000
# define Py_REFCNT(ob) Py_REFCNT(_PyObject_CAST(ob))
#if !defined(Py_LIMITED_API) || Py_LIMITED_API+0 < 0x030b0000
Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou Sep 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This #if is now redundant, right?

Copy link
Member Author

@vstinner vstinner Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's still needed. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)

@vstinner vstinner merged commit 9d344fa into python:main Sep 24, 2024
41 checks passed
@vstinner vstinner deleted the refcnt_opaque branch September 24, 2024 06:43
@vstinner
Copy link
Member Author

Merged, thanks for reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants