-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
gh-130637: Add validation for numeric response data in stat()
method
#130646
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bug, i think it did not need a NEWS entry.
This needs tests. |
Hey @ericvsmith I've added then tests Thanks for the suggestion, Please Review it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
== Tests result: FAILURE ==
1 test altered the execution environment (env changed):
test_ssl
1 test failed:
test_importlib
23 tests OK.
Total duration: 5 min 25 sec
Total tests: run=6,169 failures=1 skipped=192
Total test files: run=25/25 failed=1 env_changed=1
Result: FAILURE
Error: Process completed with exit code 2.
This test is failing and I think it is not related to the changes in this PR.
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
Also, I don't agree that there shouldn't be a NEWS entry. We put bug fixes in NEWS all the time. |
@ericvsmith I have made the requested changes; please review again. |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @ericvsmith: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
Add the NEWS entry, thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks @Mr-Sunglasses for the PR, and @ericvsmith for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12, 3.13. |
… method (pythonGH-130646) (cherry picked from commit a42168d) Co-authored-by: Kanishk Pachauri <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric V. Smith <[email protected]>
GH-130763 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch. |
… method (pythonGH-130646) (cherry picked from commit a42168d) Co-authored-by: Kanishk Pachauri <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric V. Smith <[email protected]>
GH-130764 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch. |
…` method (GH-130646) (#130764) gh-130637: Add validation for numeric response data in `stat()` method (GH-130646) (cherry picked from commit a42168d) Co-authored-by: Kanishk Pachauri <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric V. Smith <[email protected]>
…` method (GH-130646) (#130763) gh-130637: Add validation for numeric response data in `stat()` method (GH-130646) (cherry picked from commit a42168d) Co-authored-by: Kanishk Pachauri <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric V. Smith <[email protected]>
… method (python#130646) Co-authored-by: Eric V. Smith <[email protected]>
fix: #130637