Skip to content

[3.7] Revert "bpo-31961: subprocess now accepts path-like args" (GH-5912) #5931

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2018
Merged

[3.7] Revert "bpo-31961: subprocess now accepts path-like args" (GH-5912) #5931

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 27, 2018

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Feb 27, 2018 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

This reverts commit dd42cb7.
(cherry picked from commit be50a7b)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue31961

@serhiy-storchaka @miss-islington
Revert "bpo-31961: subprocess now accepts path-like args (pythonGH-4329…
d6ce482 
…)" (pythonGH-5912)

* Revert "bpo-31961: subprocess now accepts path-like args (pythonGH-4329)"

This reverts commit dd42cb7.
(cherry picked from commit be50a7b)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the type-feature A feature request or enhancement label Feb 27, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Phaqui and @gpshead: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@ned-deily ned-deily merged commit b7dcae3 into python:3.7 Feb 27, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @ned-deily!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-be50a7b-3.7 branch February 27, 2018 23:30
@Mariatta Mariatta changed the title [3.7] Revert "bpo-31961: subprocess now accepts path-like args (GH-4329)" (GH-5912) [3.7] Revert "bpo-31961: subprocess now accepts path-like args" (GH-5912) Mar 18, 2018
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2018
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gpshead gpshead Awaiting requested review from gpshead gpshead is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@miss-islington @ned-deily @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot @serhiy-storchaka