Simplify API of solver a bit

Author: compiler-errors

compiler/rustc_next_trait_solver/src/solve/eval_ctxt/mod.rs

@@ -147,13 +147,9 @@ pub trait SolverDelegateEvalExt: SolverDelegate {
     fn evaluate_root_goal(
         &self,
         goal: Goal<Self::Interner, <Self::Interner as Interner>::Predicate>,
-        generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree,
         span: <Self::Interner as Interner>::Span,
         stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<Self::Interner>>,
-    ) -> (
-        Result<GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>, NoSolution>,
-        Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>>,
-    );
+    ) -> Result<GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>, NoSolution>;
 
     /// Check whether evaluating `goal` with a depth of `root_depth` may
     /// succeed. This only returns `false` if the goal is guaranteed to
@@ -170,17 +166,16 @@ pub trait SolverDelegateEvalExt: SolverDelegate {
 
     // FIXME: This is only exposed because we need to use it in `analyse.rs`
     // which is not yet uplifted. Once that's done, we should remove this.
-    fn evaluate_root_goal_raw(
+    fn evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree(
         &self,
         goal: Goal<Self::Interner, <Self::Interner as Interner>::Predicate>,
-        generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree,
-        stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<Self::Interner>>,
+        span: <Self::Interner as Interner>::Span,
     ) -> (
         Result<
             (NestedNormalizationGoals<Self::Interner>, GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>),
             NoSolution,
         >,
-        Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>>,
+        inspect::GoalEvaluation<Self::Interner>,
     );
 }
 
@@ -193,13 +188,17 @@ where
     fn evaluate_root_goal(
         &self,
         goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>,
-        generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree,
         span: I::Span,
         stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<I>>,
-    ) -> (Result<GoalEvaluation<I>, NoSolution>, Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<I>>) {
-        EvalCtxt::enter_root(self, self.cx().recursion_limit(), generate_proof_tree, span, |ecx| {
-            ecx.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal, stalled_on)
-        })
+    ) -> Result<GoalEvaluation<I>, NoSolution> {
+        EvalCtxt::enter_root(
+            self,
+            self.cx().recursion_limit(),
+            GenerateProofTree::No,
+            span,
+            |ecx| ecx.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal, stalled_on),
+        )
+        .0
     }
 
     fn root_goal_may_hold_with_depth(
@@ -217,24 +216,22 @@ where
     }
 
     #[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
-    fn evaluate_root_goal_raw(
+    fn evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree(
         &self,
         goal: Goal<I, I::Predicate>,
-        generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree,
-        stalled_on: Option<GoalStalledOn<I>>,
+        span: I::Span,
     ) -> (
         Result<(NestedNormalizationGoals<I>, GoalEvaluation<I>), NoSolution>,
-        Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<I>>,
+        inspect::GoalEvaluation<I>,
     ) {
-        EvalCtxt::enter_root(
+        let (result, proof_tree) = EvalCtxt::enter_root(
             self,
             self.cx().recursion_limit(),
-            generate_proof_tree,
-            I::Span::dummy(),
-            |ecx| {
-                ecx.evaluate_goal_raw(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal, stalled_on)
-            },
-        )
+            GenerateProofTree::Yes,
+            span,
+            |ecx| ecx.evaluate_goal_raw(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal, None),
+        );
+        (result, proof_tree.unwrap())
     }
 }
 

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/fulfill.rs

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{
 };
 use rustc_next_trait_solver::delegate::SolverDelegate as _;
 use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{
-    GenerateProofTree, GoalEvaluation, GoalStalledOn, HasChanged, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _,
+    GoalEvaluation, GoalStalledOn, HasChanged, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _,
 };
 use rustc_span::Span;
 use thin_vec::ThinVec;
@@ -106,14 +106,11 @@ impl<'tcx> ObligationStorage<'tcx> {
             self.overflowed.extend(
                 ExtractIf::new(&mut self.pending, |(o, stalled_on)| {
                     let goal = o.as_goal();
-                    let result = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx)
-                        .evaluate_root_goal(
-                            goal,
-                            GenerateProofTree::No,
-                            o.cause.span,
-                            stalled_on.take(),
-                        )
-                        .0;
+                    let result = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx).evaluate_root_goal(
+                        goal,
+                        o.cause.span,
+                        stalled_on.take(),
+                    );
                     matches!(result, Ok(GoalEvaluation { has_changed: HasChanged::Yes, .. }))
                 })
                 .map(|(o, _)| o),
@@ -207,14 +204,7 @@ where
                     continue;
                 }
 
-                let result = delegate
-                    .evaluate_root_goal(
-                        goal,
-                        GenerateProofTree::No,
-                        obligation.cause.span,
-                        stalled_on,
-                    )
-                    .0;
+                let result = delegate.evaluate_root_goal(goal, obligation.cause.span, stalled_on);
                 self.inspect_evaluated_obligation(infcx, &obligation, &result);
                 let GoalEvaluation { certainty, has_changed, stalled_on } = match result {
                     Ok(result) => result,

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/fulfill/derive_errors.rs

@@ -11,9 +11,7 @@ use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
 use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt};
 use rustc_middle::{bug, span_bug};
-use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{
-    GenerateProofTree, GoalEvaluation, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _,
-};
+use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{GoalEvaluation, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _};
 use tracing::{instrument, trace};
 
 use crate::solve::delegate::SolverDelegate;
@@ -90,15 +88,11 @@ pub(super) fn fulfillment_error_for_stalled<'tcx>(
     root_obligation: PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
 ) -> FulfillmentError<'tcx> {
     let (code, refine_obligation) = infcx.probe(|_| {
-        match <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx)
-            .evaluate_root_goal(
-                root_obligation.as_goal(),
-                GenerateProofTree::No,
-                root_obligation.cause.span,
-                None,
-            )
-            .0
-        {
+        match <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(infcx).evaluate_root_goal(
+            root_obligation.as_goal(),
+            root_obligation.cause.span,
+            None,
+        ) {
             Ok(GoalEvaluation { certainty: Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity), .. }) => {
                 (FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: None }, true)
             }

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/analyse.rs

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{TyCtxt, VisitorResult, try_visit};
 use rustc_middle::{bug, ty};
 use rustc_next_trait_solver::resolve::eager_resolve_vars;
 use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::inspect::{self, instantiate_canonical_state};
-use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{GenerateProofTree, MaybeCause, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _};
+use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{MaybeCause, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _};
 use rustc_span::Span;
 use tracing::instrument;
 
@@ -248,9 +248,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
                     // considering the constrained RHS, and pass the resulting certainty to
                     // `InspectGoal::new` so that the goal has the right result (and maintains
                     // the impression that we don't do this normalizes-to infer hack at all).
-                    let (nested, proof_tree) =
-                        infcx.evaluate_root_goal_raw(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes, None);
-                    let proof_tree = proof_tree.unwrap();
+                    let (nested, proof_tree) = infcx.evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree(goal, span);
                     let nested_goals_result = nested.and_then(|(nested, _)| {
                         normalizes_to_term_hack.constrain_and(
                             infcx,
@@ -284,9 +282,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
                 // into another candidate who ends up with different inference
                 // constraints, we get an ICE if we already applied the constraints
                 // from the chosen candidate.
-                let proof_tree = infcx
-                    .probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::Yes, span, None).1)
-                    .unwrap();
+                let proof_tree =
+                    infcx.probe(|_| infcx.evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree(goal, span).1);
                 InspectGoal::new(infcx, self.goal.depth + 1, proof_tree, None, source)
             }
         }
@@ -488,13 +485,8 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
         depth: usize,
         visitor: &mut V,
     ) -> V::Result {
-        let (_, proof_tree) = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(self).evaluate_root_goal(
-            goal,
-            GenerateProofTree::Yes,
-            visitor.span(),
-            None,
-        );
-        let proof_tree = proof_tree.unwrap();
+        let (_, proof_tree) = <&SolverDelegate<'tcx>>::from(self)
+            .evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree(goal, visitor.span());
         visitor.visit_goal(&InspectGoal::new(self, depth, proof_tree, None, GoalSource::Misc))
     }
 }