Skip to content

Spelling inconsistency: Clonable and Cloneable #11132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
octurion opened this issue Dec 24, 2013 · 3 comments
Closed

Spelling inconsistency: Clonable and Cloneable #11132

octurion opened this issue Dec 24, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@octurion
Copy link

std::vec::MutableCloneableVector (http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/master/std/vec/trait.MutableCloneableVector.html) and std::iter::ClonableIterator (http://static.rust-lang.org/doc/master/std/iter/trait.ClonableIterator.html) do not have a consistent spelling for Clon(e)able.
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Dec 25, 2013

Nomnating.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Looks like java uses Cloneable and google autocorrects to Cloneable, so sounds like Cloneable is the way to go here.

@octurion octurion mentioned this issue Dec 27, 2013
Merged
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 28, 2013
@bors
auto merge of #11160 : octurion/rust/cloneable, r=alexcrichton
d2a4a10 
Rename all instances of ClonableIterator to CloneableIterator. This fixes bug #11132.
@octurion
Copy link
Author

Closing, pull request has been merged.

@domenic domenic mentioned this issue Feb 6, 2024
Merged
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@alexcrichton @brson @octurion