Skip to content

Merge unboxed trait object error suggestion into regular dyn incompat error #142458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2025

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Jun 13, 2025

Another hir-walker removed from the well-formed queries. This error was always a duplicate of another, but it was able to provide more information because it could invoke is_dyn_compatible without worrying about cycle errors. That's also the reason we can't put the error directly into hir_ty_lowering when lowering a dyn Trait within an associated item signature. So instead I packed it into the error handling of wf obligation checking.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 13, 2025

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 13, 2025
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Jun 20, 2025

r? @compiler-errors or reroll

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 22, 2025

📌 Commit 1d41c2c has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 22, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142458 (Merge unboxed trait object error suggestion into regular dyn incompat error)
 - #142593 (Add a warning to LateContext::get_def_path)
 - #142594 (Add DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral)
 - #142740 (Clean-up `FnCtxt::is_destruct_assignment_desugaring`)
 - #142780 (Port `#[must_use]` to new attribute parsing infrastructure)
 - #142798 (Don't fail to parse a struct if a semicolon is used to separate fields)
 - #142856 (Add a few inline directives in rustc_serialize.)
 - #142868 (remove few allow(dead_code))
 - #142874 (cranelift: fix target feature name typo: "fxsr")
 - #142877 (Document why tidy checks if `eslint` is installed via `npm`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3714263 into rust-lang:master Jun 22, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 22, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2025
Rollup merge of #142458 - oli-obk:dyn-incompat, r=compiler-errors

Merge unboxed trait object error suggestion into regular dyn incompat error

Another hir-walker removed from the well-formed queries. This error was always a duplicate of another, but it was able to provide more information because it could invoke `is_dyn_compatible` without worrying about cycle errors. That's also the reason we can't put the error directly into hir_ty_lowering when lowering a `dyn Trait` within an associated item signature. So instead I packed it into the error handling of wf obligation checking.
@oli-obk oli-obk deleted the dyn-incompat branch June 23, 2025 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants