Skip to content

Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg. #142542

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 17, 2025

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

The current SimplifyCfg pass unconditionally invalidates CFG caches. This is unfortunate if there are no modifications that require this invalidation.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 15, 2025

r? @SparrowLii

rustbot has assigned @SparrowLii.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 15, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 15, 2025

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors2 try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 15, 2025

⌛ Trying commit a16b49b with merge cc03d9f

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors2 try cancel.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2025
Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.

The current `SimplifyCfg` pass unconditionally invalidates CFG caches. This is unfortunate if there are no modifications that require this invalidation.

<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.

This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using

    r? <reviewer name>
-->
<!-- homu-ignore:end -->
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 15, 2025
@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Jun 15, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: cc03d9f (cc03d9fc4d0bea33e36b94f73ea9bce0685b0abb, parent: 75e7cf5f85aad82331a38deff24845b63eaf30f3)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@@ -121,19 +123,23 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> CfgSimplifier<'a, 'tcx> {
// Preserve `SwitchInt` reads on built and analysis MIR, or if `-Zmir-preserve-ub`.
let preserve_switch_reads = matches!(body.phase, MirPhase::Built | MirPhase::Analysis(_))
|| tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.mir_preserve_ub;
let basic_blocks = body.basic_blocks_mut();
let basic_blocks = body.basic_blocks.as_mut_preserves_cfg();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could use a comment explaining why this is okay

@@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ impl SimplifyCfg {
}

pub(super) fn simplify_cfg<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &mut Body<'tcx>) {
CfgSimplifier::new(tcx, body).simplify();
if CfgSimplifier::new(tcx, body).simplify() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coudl use a comment (even if it's reundant, b/c it's important).

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (cc03d9f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.5% [-2.5%, -2.5%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 756.494s -> 755.634s (-0.11%)
Artifact size: 372.15 MiB -> 372.16 MiB (0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 15, 2025
@SparrowLii
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 17, 2025

📌 Commit a2d9687 has been approved by SparrowLii

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 17, 2025
rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise)
 - #141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`)
 - #142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups)
 - #142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.)
 - #142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism)
 - #142570 (Reject union default field values)
 - #142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion)
 - #142585 (Update books)
 - #142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator)
 - #142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`)
 - #142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`)
 - #142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi)
 - #142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
[Create a similar rollup](https://bors.rust-lang.org/queue/rust?prs=138538,141946,142216,142542,142563,142570,142584,142585,142586,142587,142595,142598,142601)
<!-- homu-ignore:end -->
try-job: dist-apple-various
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
…r=SparrowLii

Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.

The current `SimplifyCfg` pass unconditionally invalidates CFG caches. This is unfortunate if there are no modifications that require this invalidation.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise)
 - #141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`)
 - #142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups)
 - #142371 (avoid `&mut P<T>` in `visit_expr` etc methods)
 - #142377 (Try unremapping compiler sources)
 - #142517 (Windows: Use anonymous pipes in Command)
 - #142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.)
 - #142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism)
 - #142570 (Reject union default field values)
 - #142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise)
 - #141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`)
 - #142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups)
 - #142371 (avoid `&mut P<T>` in `visit_expr` etc methods)
 - #142377 (Try unremapping compiler sources)
 - #142517 (Windows: Use anonymous pipes in Command)
 - #142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.)
 - #142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism)
 - #142570 (Reject union default field values)
 - #142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
[Create a similar rollup](https://bors.rust-lang.org/queue/rust?prs=138538,141946,142216,142371,142377,142517,142542,142563,142570,142584)
<!-- homu-ignore:end -->
try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138538 (Make performance description of String::{insert,insert_str,remove} more precise)
 - #141946 (std: refactor explanation of `NonNull`)
 - #142216 (Miscellaneous RefCell cleanups)
 - #142542 (Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.)
 - #142563 (Refine run-make test ignores due to unpredictable `i686-pc-windows-gnu` unwind mechanism)
 - #142570 (Reject union default field values)
 - #142584 (Handle same-crate macro for borrowck semicolon suggestion)
 - #142585 (Update books)
 - #142586 (Fold unnecessary `visit_struct_field_def` in AstValidator)
 - #142587 (Make sure to propagate result from `visit_expr_fields`)
 - #142595 (Revert overeager warning for misuse of `--print native-static-libs`)
 - #142598 (Set elf e_flags on ppc64 targets according to abi)
 - #142601 (Add a comment to `FORMAT_VERSION`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 725d829 into rust-lang:master Jun 17, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone Jun 17, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Rollup merge of #142542 - cjgillot:invalidate-simplify-cfg, r=SparrowLii

Manually invalidate caches in SimplifyCfg.

The current `SimplifyCfg` pass unconditionally invalidates CFG caches. This is unfortunate if there are no modifications that require this invalidation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants