AdSense Mobile Ad

Showing posts with label ejb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ejb. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

EJB 3.1 Global JNDI Access

Table of Contents


As outlined in the previous parts of this series, the major drawback of the EJB v. 3.0 Specification was the lack of portable global JNDI names. This implies that there's no portable way to link EJB references to a bean outside your application.

The EJB v. 3.1 Specification fills this gap defining, in its own words:

"a standardized global JNDI namespace and a series of related namespaces that map to the various scopes of a Java EE application."

This blog post will give you an overview of the Global JNDI Access as defined by the EJB v. 3.1 Specification.

Namespaces and Scopes

The EJB v. 3.1 Specification defines three distinct namespaces with its own scopes:
  • Global.
  • Application.
  • Module.

The specification requires compliant containers to register all of the session beans with the required JNDI names. Such standardized names are portable and your application components will be able to establish a reference to an EJB using a name that is portable across application servers.

Global

Names in the global namespace will be accessible to code in any application and conform to the following syntax:

java:global[/<app-name>]/<module-name>/<bean-name>[!<interface-FQN>]

<app-name> is the name of the Java EE application as specified in its standard deployment descriptor (application.xml) or, by default, the base name of the deployed EAR archive. This path fragment is used only if the session EJB is deployed within a Java EE application EAR file.

If the session EJB is deployed in an EAR file, its <module-name> is the path name of the Java EE module that contains the bean (without extension) inside the EAR file. If the session bean is deployed as a standalone Java EE component in a JAR file or as part of a Java EE web module in a WAR file (which is now allowed by the Java EE 6 Specification), the <module-name> is the name of the archive (without extension). The <module-name> value can be overridden by the <module-name/> element of the component's standard deployment descriptor (ejb-jar.xml or web.xml).

The <bean-name> is the EJB name as specified by the mechanisms described in the previous parts of this blog post.

The <interface-FQN> part is the fully qualified name of the EJB business interface.

The container has to register one JNDI global entry for every local and remote business interface implemented by the EJB and its no-interface view.

Session EJB With One Business Interface or a No-Interface View

If an EJB implements only one business interface or only has a no-interface view, the container is also required to register such a view with the following JNDI name:

java:global[/<app-name>]/<module-name>/<bean-name>

Application

Names in the application namespace will be accessible only to code within the same application and conform to the following syntax:

java:app/<module-name>/<bean-name>[!<interface-FQN>]

Each path fragment retains the same meaning described for the global namespace JNDI names syntax in the previous section.

The same publishing rules for a compliant container described in the previous section apply.

Module

Names in the module namespace will be accessible only to code within the same module and conform to the following syntax:

java:module/<bean-name>[!<interface-FQN>]

Once more, each path fragment retains the same meaning described for the global namespace JNDI names.

The same publishing rules for a compliant container described in the global namespace section.

Local Clients

It may be important to notice that, although global JNDI names for local interfaces (and no-interface views) are published, this does not imply that such an interface will be accessible to components running in another JVM.

Conclusions

The EJB v. 3.1 Specification, and other specifications in the Java EE 6 Platform, brings simplicity and adds many new features and tools to the developers' toolboxes. "Global JNDI names" is an outstanding, although simple, feature because it finally fills a long-standing portability limitation of the previous revisions of this specification and, hence, of the entire Java EE platform.

EJB 3.0 and EJB 3.1 provide a powerful, portable, yet simple component model to build enterprise applications. The "EJB sucks" day are gone but only time will tell if this technology will regain the trust of Us, The Developers.

As far as it concerns myself, I feel pretty comfortable with Java EE 6, EJBs, CDI beans, the good support I have from IDEs such as NetBeans or JDeveloper (although the latter does not support EJB 3.1 yet), and all the specifications that build up this venerable platform.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

References to EJBs Outside Your Application With Oracle WebLogic

Table of Contents


In the previous posts we made an overview of the EJB v. 3.0 and of the portable mechanisms it provides you to build your Java EE application. Since Java EE specifications are all about portability, at the risk of repeating ourselves we've often stressed the most important portability limit still present on the EJB v. 3.0 specifications: there is no portable way to declare and link a reference to an EJB outside your application.

Although there exist other standards (such as Web Services) that let you loosely couple components of your applications, remote EJBs are still an ideal mean to accomplish this task because of their simplicity, their standardization, the good development support of many IDEs and the good performance they provide.

In this blog post we'll make an overview of the mechanisms provided by one of the leading Java EE application servers, Oracle WebLogic, to give support to references to EJBs outside the scope of your application.

mappedName in Oracle WebLogic

Java EE compliant application servers provide additional non-portable API, tools and mechanisms used to enhance the standard Java EE features they implement. One of the features we've mentioned in the first part of this series was the mappedName @EJB element.

Although the EJB v. 3.0 Specification is willingly unclear about this element (that was sort of replaced by the lookup element introduced by the EJB v. 3.1 Specification), many application server vendors have implemented it with the intuitive behavior suggested by its own name: mapping an EJB to a global JNDI name.

If you want to trade portability for simplicity, many application servers (such as Oracle WebLogic or GlassFish) will let you define a bean's global JNDI name with the value of the mappedName element (or its corresponding deployment descriptor element.) As already stated, beware that Oracle WebLogic will assign global JNDI names to remote business interfaces only. This isn't really a limitation since local business interfaces can always be referenced using the APIs described in the previous parts of this series.

Oracle WebLogic Naming Conventions for EJB Remote Business Interfaces

With such a mechanism in place, linking a reference to a bean outside your application is straightforward. JDeveloper's EJB wizard, indeed, will put a default mappedName for you with an intuitive naming scheme that resembles somehow the new portable global JNDI names introduced by the EJB v. 3.1 specification, as shown in the following screenshot:


The naming scheme suggested by JDeveloper is the following:

mappedName = [application-name]-[module-name]-[bean-name]

If adopted, this naming scheme provides an easy way to assign every bean an unique name throughout your applications. I recognize that such names are a bit awkward but, being non-portable, is a naming scheme as good as any other.

Global JNDI Names for Remote EJB Interfaces in Oracle WebLogic

The global JNDI names of the remote business interfaces of an EJB with a mappedName in Oracle WebLogic Application Server will be:

mappedName#[interface-FQN]

Using this naming scheme will allow you to build loosely coupled Java EE application that reuse each other EJBs. If you want to inspect your server JNDI tree and check the actual names of your deployed EJB, you can use WebLogic's JNDI Tree inspector, which can be launched opening the WebLogic console, navigating to the Environment/Servers/[your-server] page and using the View JNDI Tree link. In the following screenshot you can examine the global JNDI entry for a bean defined as follows:

package es.reacts;

import ...;

@Stateless(name = "EJBByMappedName", mappedName = "Application1-EjbTest0-EJBByMappedName")
@Remote
public class EJBByMappedNameBean implements RemoteByMappedName {
  [...]
}


In the screenshot you can appreciate the entry corresponding to the es.reacts.RemoteByMappedName business interface.

Customizing the JNDI Name of an EJB Remote Interface

Oracle WebLogic provides you the necessary tools to customize and override its default naming conventions for EJB remote interfaces. To assign or override the global JNDI name of an EJB remote interface you can use the WebLogic specific deployment descriptors. In the case of an EJB module, for example, you can use JDeveloper to quickly add a default weblogic-ejb-jar.xml or, if using another IDE such as NetBeans, you can create a new XML file named weblogic-ejb-jar.xml in the META-INF directory of your module. An empty weblogic-ejb-jar.xml file looks like this (as of Oracle WebLogic 10.3):

<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<weblogic-ejb-jar xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-ejb-jar http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-ejb-jar/1.0/weblogic-ejb-jar.xsd"
  xmlns="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-ejb-jar">
</weblogic-ejb-jar>

To assign or override a global JNDI name for a given EJB remote interface you can use the following elements:

<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<weblogic-ejb-jar xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-ejb-jar http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-ejb-jar/1.0/weblogic-ejb-jar.xsd"
  xmlns="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-ejb-jar">
  <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
    <ejb-name>SessionTest0</ejb-name>
    <stateless-session-descriptor>
      <business-interface-jndi-name-map>
        <business-remote>es.reacts.SessionTest0</business-remote>
        <jndi-name>global-jndi-name</jndi-name>
      </business-interface-jndi-name-map>
    </stateless-session-descriptor>
  </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
</weblogic-ejb-jar>

If you're using JDeveloper, it provides you an easy GUI to edit the weblogic-ejb-jar.xml file:


The JDeveloper GUI will let you easily customize the WebLogic deployment descriptor and configure other non-portable features of the WebLogic Application Server such as EJB clustering.

Linking an EJB Reference to a Global JNDI Name

In the previous section we made an overview of the tools that Oracle WebLogic Application Server provides to customize the execution environment and establish a global JNDI name for a remote interface of an EJB. In the same way, Oracle WebLogic provides you other tools to link an EJB reference to a specific target EJB using a global JNDI name.

In the examples seen so far, we've always linked an EJB reference to a target using the portable mechanisms provided by the EJB v. 3.0 Specification. If you need to establish a target to a remote EJB outside the scope of your application, you can use the WebLogic-specific deployment descriptor of the module that acts as the EJB client. In the case of the Java EE module we've used so far, you can use JDeveloper to add the WebLogic-specific deployment descriptor called weblogic.xml. If you're using other IDEs, the skeleton of this file is the following (as of Oracle WebLogic 10.3):

<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<weblogic-web-app xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-web-app http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-web-app/1.0/weblogic-web-app.xsd"
  xmlns="http://www.bea.com/ns/weblogic/weblogic-web-app">
  <ejb-reference-description>
    <ejb-ref-name>ejb/myGlobalRef</ejb-ref-name>
    <jndi-name>global-jndi-name</jndi-name>
  </ejb-reference-description>
</weblogic-web-app>

This weblogic.xml deployment descriptor links the EJB reference ejb/myGlobalRef with the object stored with the global JNDI name global-jndi-name, that is the name we've specified in the weblogic-ejb-jar.xml file described in the previous section. This reference will be declared as usual with a @EJB annotation or in the standard deployment descriptor (in this case, the web.xml file).

If you're using JDeveloper, a GUI will help you build the WebLogic-specific deployment descriptor. The GUI is well done and is also able to scan you module's EJB references and let them choose from a list when customizing them.

Next Steps

In this part we've learnt how to use WebLogic-specific tools in the case we had to link an EJB reference to an EJB that lives outsides our application using a global JNDI name. In the following part (coming soon) we'll see how the EJB v. 3.1 Specification has (finally) filled this gap defining portable JNDI names. With EJB v. 3.1 you'll be able to build modular Java EE application that reuse components of one another without the need to rely on non-portable mechanisms any longer.







EJB Programmatic Lookup

Table of Contents


In our previous post we learnt about EJB references and EJB injection. Even though EJB injection is a powerful container facility that eases modular application development, sometimes performing a programmatic EJB lookup is instead desirable.

Let's suppose, for example, that a set of distinct EJBs implement a common strategy, defined by a common business interface. Depending on the result of some choice algorithm (such as a business rule), a different strategy is chosen and hence a different EJB will be executed in the scope of a business process. In such a scenario the target EJB cannot be chosen at injection time since annotation elements (such as @EJB's) are defined at compilation time and deployment descriptors are defined at deployment time. The only solution to this problem is a programmatic JNDI lookup.

The same mechanisms described in the previous posts will apply. EJB references will be declared and linked against a name in your application private namespace using the @EJB annotation or the corresponding elements of your Java EE module deployment descriptor.

Lookup in the Application Private Namespace

The portable way to establish an indirection level between the namespace used in your lookup code and the target EJBs is using your application private namespace. This kind of indirection level is quite common in the Java EE platform: not only it is used for EJB references but for all sorts of resource references such as JDBC data sources, JMS queues, JavaMail sessions, etc.

In the case of EJBs, as seen in our previous post, you simply define a private name used by lookup and injection code of your application. This is a private application-scoped name and is a subelement of the java:comp/env JNDI entry. With the aid of the @EJB annotation and of the deployment descriptors, you can establish a link between this name and a target EJB. The only difference is that instead of relying on the container to inject a reference into a component of yours, your application algorithms will choose the appropriate EJB and will look it up dynamically.

As we've seen in part 2 of this series, the @EJB annotation can be used at type, method and field level to declare a reference to an EJB and, optionally, to link it to the target bean without the need of writing any deployment descriptor code.

If the case of dynamic programmatic JNDI lookup, instead of annotating a field (or a property) as an injection target, you can annotate a class (such as a Servlet) to establish a reference to an EJB. In the following example we'll see how to do it with both the @EJB annotation and the deployment descriptor.

Declaring a Reference to an EJB

In the test servlet we've used throughout our previous posts, we can use the @EJB annotation at class level to declare a reference to an EJB in the private name ejb/ejbLocalRef:

@EJB(name = "ejb/ejbLocalRef",
     beanInterface = es.reacts.SessionTest0Local.class,
     beanName = "EJBServer1.jar#SessionTest1")
public class ServletTest1 extends HttpServlet {
  [...]
}

The annotation in the previous example is functionally equivalent to the following deployment descriptor (in this case, the web.xml file) fragment:

<ejb-local-ref>
  <ejb-ref-name>ejb/ejbLocalRef</ejb-ref-name>
  <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
  <local>es.reacts.SessionTest0Local</local>
  <ejb-link>EJBServer1.jar#SessionTest1</ejb-link>
</ejb-local-ref>

The most important difference between the @EJB semantics in this example and in the examples in the previous post is that in this case we're providing all of the information required to establish the reference and the link to the target EJB without injecting nor even relying on information coming from the injection target (such as the beanInterface).

Although the annotation is applied at a class level, it is effectively equivalent to adding the corresponding deployment descriptor elements and, therefore, the declared reference will be available throughout your Java EE module. In this case, any other servlet in your Java EE web module will be able to inject or lookup the very same EJB referenced by the ejb/ejbLocalRef name:

@EJB(name = "ejb/ejbLocalRef")
SessionTest0Local lc4;

Additional "plumbing" here is not necessary since the reference declaration contains all of the information that is required to resolve the target EJB.

EJB Programmatic Lookup

Since a reference has been declared and linked, our code is now able to make a JNDI lookup and retrieve a reference to the desired business interface of our target EJB. The JNDI lookup code is the good ole lookup code we're used to (with a little difference we'll point out later):

InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
Object obj = ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/ejbLocalRef");
if (obj instanceof SessionTest0Local) {
  SessionTest0Local lc = (SessionTest0Local) obj;
  [...]
}

(* Please note that the previous fragment has been stripped of the required exception handling code.)

The good news with EJB 3.0 is that you don't need to narrow the reference using the PortableRemoteObject.narrow() method as was required by the EJB v. 2.1 Specification. In the example code we can directly test the reference with the instanceof operator and use a Java native cast to set a SessionTest0Local reference.

There's absolutely no difference between looking up local and remote business interfaces. Only in the case you rely on the deployment descriptor, the declaration and the linking of the EJB references will be performed using an <ejb-ref/> or an <ejb-local-ref/> according to the EJB business interface type. As far as it concerns your application, the lookup code will be identical.

Patterns

In scenarios in which you don't use EJB injection and rely on lookup instead, there are both advantages and disadvantages in using annotations or the deployment descriptors to declare and link EJB references.

The advantages of annotations is that they're easier to write and use than the corresponding deployment descriptors elements. Moreover, as far as it concerns my experience, IDE support for code autocompletion might be a better tool than some deployment descriptor editors which are "obscure", at best (with notable exceptions such as Oracle JDeveloper's and NetBeans'.)

The advantage of the deployment descriptor is that it can centralize resource references declarations. If the same EJB reference is used throughout the code of your Java EE module and is not confined to a single class, a best option is using the deployment descriptor to declare and link the EJB (and other resource) reference and avoid using annotations at all. This is a design choice that has to be taken carefully. In the uses cases in which a lookup is desirable, chances are that EJB linking might be performed in the application assembly and deployment stages. Having references well documented and declared in a central repository might still be preferable instead of having @EJB annotation scattered throughout your code and the task of the deployer might get considerably eased.

Next Steps

In the following part we'll see how application server-specific mechanisms will help us build modular Java EE applications and link EJB references to EJB remote business interfaces outside our application. We'll explore the tools provided by a leading Java EE compliant application server: Oracle WebLogic.


Thursday, September 23, 2010

Basic EJB References, Injection and Lookup

Table of Contents


In the first part of this series we've introduced the mechanisms provided by the Enterprise JavaBeans v. 3.0 Specification to define EJB components, declare a reference to an EJB and wiring them up both by dependency injection or programmatic JNDI lookup.

In this blog post we'll examine some basic examples to understand how to use the EJB API.

A Basic EJB

An EJB is basically a POJO with some extra EJB metadata. The required metadata to deploy it as an EJB component can be provided both by using the EJB annotations or by the standard deployment descriptor. The following class implements a very basic stateless session EJB:

package es.reacts;

import javax.ejb.Stateless;

@Stateless(name = "UniqueLocalSessionEJB")
public class UniqueLocalSessionEJBBean implements UniqueLocalBusinessInterface {
    public UniqueLocalSessionEJBBean() {
    }
    
    public String sayLocalHello() {
      return this.getClass().getName() + "::" + "Local hello.";
    }
}

As you may recollect from our previous blog post, the @Stateless annotation is used to define a stateless session bean. The optional name element is used to define the session bean name. This element is analogous to the <ejb-name/> element of the standard deployment descriptor. This element defaults to the unqualified name of the bean class (UniqueLocalSessionEJBBean in the example above), and the example above uses it to rename the bean to UniqueLocalSessionEJB.

Since we're using the @Stateless annotation, there's no further need to declare the EJB in the deployment descriptor.

In this example, we're assuming that the EJB is packaged in an EJB module that depends on the module containing the definition of its business interface (as explained in the following section.)

Business interfaces

Every EJB implements one or more business interfaces. Business interfaces can be local or remote. The most important differences between the two types of business interfaces can be summarized as follows:
  • Local business interfaces use pass-by-reference semantics for their methods and method invocations cannot cross the JVM boundary. Local business interfaces are available only to callers in the same application and JVM instance of the callee.
  • Remote business interfaces use pass-by-value semantics for their methods and method invocations can cross the JVM boundary. Remote business interfaces are available to callers outside the application of the callee.

In the previous example, the business interface UniqueLocalBusinessInterface is declared as follows:

package es.reacts;

import javax.ejb.Local;

@Local
public interface UniqueLocalBusinessInterface {
    String sayLocalHello();
}

In the EJB v. 3.0 world a business interface is just a plain old Java interface annotated with either the @Local or @Remote annotation.

Packaging Business Interfaces

In this example we're assuming that the EJB business interface is packaged in a JAR file that the EJB module depends on. Since EJB clients only depend on an EJB business interface, it's a good practice to package the business interfaces in a separate library in order to ease the interface distribution and to decouple them from their implementations.

Injecting an EJB into a Java Servlet

Now that we've defined an EJB, we're ready to use it from a servlet in a Java EE web module. Assuming that there's only one EJB implemented the UniqueLocalBusinessInterface in our application, we can inject it using an empty @EJB annotation:

package es.reacts;

import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.PrintWriter;

import javax.ejb.EJB;

import javax.servlet.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;

public class ServletTest1 extends HttpServlet {
  @EJB
  UniqueLocalBusinessInterface lc;

  public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request,
    HttpServletResponse response)
    throws ServletException, IOException {
    [...]
    lc.sayLocalHello();
    [...]
  }

The first thing to note is that the EJB is injected into our servlet by the application server since the bean interface alone is sufficient to identify the target EJB. In this case the beanInterface element of the @EJB annotation takes on its default value, as explained in our previous post, that is the type of the injected field: UniqueLocalBusinessInterface. Since there's just one EJB in the application that implements this business interface, the lc field of the servlet is injected with a reference to an instance of such a class.

The second thing worth pointing out is that we're injecting an EJB into a servlet field safely because the EJB is stateless. Since servlet are stateless by default, you should not inject stateful resources into servlet fields properties otherwise you may run into concurrency-related problems. If you needed to use a stateful EJB into a servlet, you should retrieve a reference by programmatic JNDI lookup since that will guarantee that a new instance is returned for every lookup operation.

Let's deploy and run our application and we'll see that the servlet is injected its target EJB and the method invocation to the sayLocalHello() method of its business interface is carried out correctly.

If we wanted to inject a reference to a remote interface the client code would not be affected. If you try and change the UniqueLocalBusinessInterface from @Local to @Remote, you'll see that the servlet sees no change and continues to work correctly.

What Happens If More Than One EJB Implements the Same Interface?

Let's suppose that the we add another EJB in our EJB module in this application that implements the same interface as the previous one, UniqueLocalBusinessInterface. In this case, since the bean interface is not sufficient any longer to determine the target bean for injection, you'll be returned an error. Deploying such an application in the WebLogic Application Server, for example, results in the following error being thrown:

[08:46:25 PM] Caused by: weblogic.deployment.EnvironmentException: [J2EE:160199]Error resolving ejb-ref 'es.reacts.ServletTest1/lc1' from module 'WebTest0' of application 'EJBTestApp'. The ejb-ref does not have an ejb-link and the JNDI name of the target bean has not been specified. Attempts to automatically link the ejb-ref to its target bean failed because multiple EJBs in the application were found to implement the 'es.reacts.UniqueLocalBusinessInterface' interface. Please specify a qualified ejb-link for this ejb-ref to indicate which EJB is the target of this ejb-ref.

Injecting a Reference to a Specific EJB Instance

To solve the problem occurred in the previous section we need to provide the application server with the required information to identify the target EJB. As explained in our previous post, we can use the following two methods:
  • Either we use the name element of the @EJB annotation (or the corresponding <ejb-ref-name/> element of the deployment descriptor) to declare an EJB reference in the private namespace of the application and link it to the target bean using the deployment descriptor.
  • Or we use the beanName element of the @EJB annotation (or the corresponding <ejb-link/> element of the deployment descriptor) to do it directly in our code.

Mapping an EJB into the Private Namespace

Using the first method we'll end up with the following code in our servlet:

@EJB(name = "ejb/bean-name")
UniqueLocalBusinessInterface lc;

and the following element in the deployment descriptor (web.xml) of our Java EE web module that acts as an EJB client:

<ejb-local-ref>
  <ejb-ref-name>ejb/bean-name</ejb-ref-name>
  <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
  <local>es.reacts.UniqueLocalBusinessInterface</local>
  <ejb-link>UniqueLocalSessionEJB</ejb-link>
</ejb-local-ref>

The <ejb-link/> element contains the bean name that we defined at the beginning of our example with the annotation:

@Stateless(name = "UniqueLocalSessionEJB")

in the EJB implementation class.

Please note that, in this example, we used the @EJB name element explicitely but we could have established the link using its default value. The default value of the name element is:

[qualified class name]/[property or field name]

that, in this case, would be:

es.reacts.ServletTest1/lc

The disadvantage of using the default auto-generated name together with EJB linking using <ejb-link/> is that every time you refactor your code you'll have to check the deployment descriptors. Although developers sometimes think otherwise, the Java EE Specification defines some other roles such as the assambler and the deployer. In large corporate environments, it's not uncommon for such profiles to override developers' annotations to "plumb" the components used by the applications. Annotation override is one of the reasons why standard deployment descriptors still exist. This is especially true when references are to remote components, inside or outside your application. For this reason I suggest you do not rely on auto-generated names and use custom well documented names instead.

Linking an EJB to a Reference in the Private Namespace

The second method provides a direct way to link the reference to its target bean using the beanName element of the @EJB annotation. The servlet code will use the following EJB reference:

@EJB(beanName = "UniqueLocalSessionEJB")
UniqueLocalBusinessInterface lc;

and we need no additional information in the deployment descriptor.

Although this method allows the developer to link a reference to an EJB without relying on the deployment descriptor, the suggestion given at the end of the previous section is still valid. Remember that annotations can be overridden at deployment time! Do not link an EJB to a reference if you know beforehand that such a reference is eligible for override. In such cases, prefer assigning a name to the reference instead, as explained in the previous section.

Next Steps

In the following post we'll make a quick overview of how the EJB 3.0 API can be used to perform EJB programmatic lookups.


An Introduction to EJB 3.0 Injection and Lookup

Table of Contents


Introduction

The Enterprise JavaBeans Specification v. 3.0 introduces a simplified, annotation based API for EJB injection and lookup. EJB 3.0 are now POJOs and can be injected in other components (such as EJBs and Servlets) using simple annotations. EJB 3.0 is one of many other POJO-based specifications that made it to Java EE 6, such as JSR-229 "Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE Platform" (formerly known as "Web Beans"). Java EE has never been so easy!

Nevertheless, while EJB 3.0 annotations hide away from the programmer the complexities of assembling a Java EE application and wiring all of its components, there are some subtleties that you should be aware of. Some of them, such as "global JNDI names", were address by the Enterprise JavaBeans Specification v. 3.1. Meanwhile, until Java EE 6 application servers are widely deployed, you might be exposed to the risk of writing code that relies upon non-portable application server specific behaviour.

To make things worse, some of the problems you might encounter show up when using an EJB local interface, which supposedly is an application-scoped interface of a bean of your own. Since local business interfaces actually imply a local method call (they use a pass-by-reference semantics and are restricted to the same JVM instance) such interfaces are the preferred choice when accessing the business interfaces of the components in your application. Often, this use case will make up most of the EJB calls in your Java EE application.

Declaring an EJB

According to the EJB v. 3.0 Simplified API Specification, when declaring a session bean you may use two annotations, depending on the session bean type:
  • @Stateless
  • @Stateful

Both annotations share two common annotation elements: name and mappedName.

name

The annotation element name defines the bean "name" and defaults to the unqualified name of the bean class. The bean name must be unique in the scope of the module containing the EJB.

mappedName

The EJB 3.0 Specification defines mappedName as a "product-specific name that the session bean should be mapped to." Often, application server use mappedName to map a session bean to a global JNDI name. The EJB 3.1 specification sort of deprecates the mappedName element and introduces the concept of "portable global JNDI name".

We'll soon see how and when to use such metadata.

EJB References

To establish a reference to an EJB, you may use the @EJB annotation or the standard deployment descriptors (via <ejb-ref/> and <ejb-local-ref/>). The @EJB annotation is defined as follows:

@Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD}) @Retention(RUNTIME)
public @interface EJB {
  String name() default "";
  Class beanInterface() default Object.class;
  String beanName() default "";
  String mappedName() default "";
  String description() default "";
}


name

The name element defines the injected EJB name "in the application environment". The EJB name, then, is the location of the injected object in the private namespace java:comp/env. Its default value it's the fully qualified name of the annotated class field or property. When the @EJB annotation is used at class level the name element is mandatory.

The name element is the equivalent of the <ejb-ref-name/> element in the deployment descriptor:

<ejb-ref>
  <ejb-ref-name>bean name</ejb-ref-name>
  [...]
</ejb-ref>

beanInterface

The beanInterface is the business interface type of the injected component. By default, it's the type of the annotated field or property. When the @EJB annotation is used at class level the beanInterface element is mandatory.

The beanInterface element is the equivalent of the <remote/> or <local/> elements in the deployment descriptor:

<ejb-ref>
  <ejb-ref-name>bean name</ejb-ref-name>
  <remote>bean interface</remote>
  [...]
</ejb-ref>

beanName

The beanName element specifies the bean "name" as declared in the @Stateful and @Stateless annotations via the name element or in the deployment descriptor via the <ejb-name/> element. The beanName element is most useful when more than one EJB implement the same business interface in an application: the beanName lets the developer reference a specific EJB in a specific module. The syntax to use in this case is:

<ejb module>#<ejb name>

The bean name is resolved automatically if there's only one EJB implementing the requested business interface in the application.

The beanName element is the equivalent of the <ejb-link/> element in the deployment descriptor:

<ejb-ref>
  <ejb-ref-name>bean name</ejb-ref-name>
  <remote>bean interface</remote>
  <ejb-link>linked ejb</ejb-link>
  [...]
</ejb-ref>

mappedName

As in the case of the mappedName element of the @Stateless and @Stateful annotations, the mappedName is a product-specific metadata whose use is not portable.

The mappedName element is the equivalent of the <mapped-name/> element in the deployment descriptor:

<ejb-ref>
  <ejb-ref-name>bean name</ejb-ref-name>
  <remote>bean interface</remote>
  <ejb-link>linked ejb</ejb-link>
  <mapped-name>mapped name</mapped-name>
  [...]
</ejb-ref>

What About Beans in Other Applications?

If you review the mechanisms described so far, you should notice that there's no (portable) way to declare a dependency (an EJB reference) to a bean outside the application. The EJB Specification v. 3.1 addresses this problem and defines portable global JNDI names. No changes will be required for a compliant EJB v. 3.0 to be assigned a portable global JNDI name in a compliant EJB v. 3.1 container.

Meanwhile, to wire a reference to an EJB outside your application, you should rely on the mechanisms provided by your application server.

Do Not Rely on Non-Portable Global JNDI Names to Lookup an EJB

As outlined in the previous sections, before EJB v. 3.1 there was no portable way to lookup an EJB with a global JNDI name and the deployer has to rely on application server specific tools and metadata to establish a link between an EJB reference and an EJB global JNDI name. Such a link, moreover, is necessary when establishing a reference to a bean outside your application.

Even if it's appealing to avoid using the @EJB annotation elements (or their corresponding deployment descriptor elements) and use global JNDI names instead, you should always rely on EJB references and lookup in your java:comp/env private namespace. Your private namespace and the mapping mechanism provide you the level of indirection that will isolate your code from configuration changes.

This also means that, if you're restricted to EJB v. 3.0, you should always use the beanName (<ejb-link/>) mechanism and performing lookups in your private java:comp/env namespace. Many times I've heard the story of some developer inspecting the global JNDI tree of an application server to deduce the application server global JNDI naming scheme for EJBs and then experiencing some NamingException here and there. For this reason, avoid using the @EJB mappedName element and rely on name and beanName instead.

Some application servers, for example, publish both remote and local EJB business interfaces with global JNDI names. Others simply don't. Oracle WebLogic is one of the latter. The EJB v. 3.0 specification, indeed, does not require a local business interface to be available in the global JNDI tree.

Looking Up Remote and Local Business Interfaces

As far as it concerns the caller, the process of acquiring a reference to a remote and to a local business interface should be identical. Unfortunately, that's not always the case if you don't rely only on portable mechanisms.

References to local interfaces of EJBs can always be resolved with the beanName mechanism. This is not always the case for references to remote interfaces since such EJB might live outside your application. Here's, then, another reason not to rely on global JNDI names in your code: not only such a code would be not portable, but it would require you to use different strategies to lookup remote and local business interfaces (depending on the application server.) The business interface type would not be transparent and a change in a business interface type could break your code.

An Easy Pattern to Establish EJB References

Although they might be necessary in some scenarios, avoid EJB lookups and rely on @EJB references "auto-wiring". Respecting some easy patterns guarantees that your EJB references will be declared and satisfied in a completely automatic way:
  • Try to reduce the number of EJB that share business interfaces: if just one EJB implement a specific business interface in an application, an EJB reference can be automatically declared and wired with a default @EJB annotation.
  • If sharing business interfaces improves your application design, define a clear naming policy for beans of your application and avoid duplications: if there's only one bean with a specific name, an EJB reference can be automatically declared and wired with a @EJB(beanName="[name]") annotation. If there's more than one bean with the same name, you'll be forced to use the @EJB(beanName="[ejb-module-path]#[ejb-name]") syntax when declaring references.
  • If you need to lookup EJB references programmatically, declare a location for your EJBs in your local namespace using the @EJB name element (or the <ejb-ref-name/> element) and link it to the target EJB with the @EJB beanName element (or the <ejb-link/> element.)

Next Steps

In the following blog post, we'll examine some example to clarify how to use the EJB v. 3.0 APIs to declare EJB references and use dependency injection and programmatic lookup to obtain a reference to an EJB business interface.