Design | Primarily designed for processing plain text. | Designed to process both emails and multimedia files. |
---|
Cost | Less expensive compared to S/MIME. | More expensive due to reliance on certificates and infrastructure. |
---|
Use Case | Suitable for personal and office use. | Primarily used in industrial environments and large organizations. |
---|
Efficiency | Less efficient than S/MIME. | More efficient, especially in enterprise environments. |
---|
Key Exchange | Depends on user key exchange (e.g., Web of Trust). | Relies on a hierarchically valid certificate (PKI) for key exchange. |
---|
Convenience | Less convenient due to manual setup and key management. | More convenient with secure, automated transformation of applications. |
---|
Public Keys | Typically supports up to 4096-bit public keys. | Generally uses smaller 1024-bit public keys. |
---|
Encryption Standard | Recognized as a standard for strong encryption. | Also a standard for strong encryption, but with some limitations. |
---|
Use in VPNs | Can be used in VPNs. | Primarily used for email services, not in VPNs. |
---|
Digital Signature | Uses the Diffie-Hellman algorithm for digital signatures. | Uses the Elgamal algorithm for digital signatures. |
---|
Trust Model | Trust is established using a Web of Trust model. | Trust is established using a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). |
---|
Security Scope | Primarily used for securing text messages. | Secures both messages and attachments. |
---|
Industry Adoption | Less widely adopted in industry. | More widely used in industry, particularly for email security. |
---|
Convenience | Lower convenience due to more manual steps. | Higher convenience, particularly in corporate environments. |
---|
Administrative Overhead | Higher administrative overhead due to manual key management. | Lower administrative overhead thanks to centralized certificate management. |
---|