An Automatic Color Feature Vector Classification Based on Clustering Method

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI) | Volume IV, Issue IV, April 2017 | ISSN 2321–2705
www.rsisinternational.org Page 13
An Automatic Color Feature Vector Classification
Based on Clustering Method
T. Balaji
Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Govt. Arts College, Melur, India
Abstract - In computer vision application, visual features such as
shape, color and texture are extracted to characterize images.
Each of the features is represented using one or more feature
descriptors. One of the important requirements in image
retrieval, indexing, classification, clustering, etc. is extracting
efficient features from images. The color feature is one of the
most widely used visual features. Use of color histogram is the
most common way for representing color feature. One of
disadvantage of the color histogram is that it does not take the
color spatial distribution into consideration. In this paper an
automatic color feature vector classification based on clustering
approach is presented, which effectively describes the spatial
information of color features. The image retrieval results are
compare to improved color feature vector show the acceptable
efficiency of this approach. It propose an automatic color feature
vector classification of satellite images using clustering approach.
The intention is to study cluster a set of satellite images in several
categories on the color similarity basis. The images are processed
using LAB color space in the feature extraction stage. The
resulted color-based feature vectors are clustered using an
automatic unsupervised classification algorithm. Some
experiments based on the proposed recognition technique have
also been performed. More research, however, is needed to
identify and reduce uncertainties in the image processing chain
to improve classification accuracy. The mathematical training
and prediction analysis of a general familiarity with satellite
classifications meet typical map accuracy standards.
Keywords: Feature Extraction, Classification, Clustering and
Feature Vector
I. INTRODUCTION
igital image recognition represents an important
computer vision domain. An image recognition process
consists of classifying a set of images on the basis of their
content similarity. As any pattern recognition task, image
recognition is characterized by a feature extraction step and a
feature vector classification. The feature extraction consists of
an image content analysis. The image content is provided by
its color, texture and shape information. Numerous color,
texture and shape analysis techniques have been developed in
recent years. The image classification process may have a
supervised character, using a template image set, or an
unsupervised character. It provide an automatic unsupervised
image recognition technique. Therefore, we consider the
following automatic recognition task. If {I1,…IN} represents
the set of color images to be recognized, these digital images
have to be clustered automatically in a number of color-based
classes. First, to propose an image feature extraction that uses
LAB color space characteristics. This featuring process is
described in an automatic feature vector clustering technique
based on a K-Means algorithm.
Color, texture and shape are the most common visually
features. These features are independent of specific domain
and can use in general systems of retrieval images. The color
feature is the first and one of the most widely used visual
features in image retrieval and indexing. The most important
advantages of color feature are power of representing visual
content of images, simple extracting color information of
images and high efficiency, relatively power in separating
images from each other, relatively robust to background
complication and independent of image size and orientation.
Image is a different kind of data which includes a huge
amount of information, such as color information, objects,
edges, pixel definition, dimensions and others. Therefore the
treatment of image data is a sensitive concern to preserve the
complete information.
This paper addresses the various key features and
properties of image data by which the information from the
image is extracted and utilized for different applications of
face recognition, image retrieval and others. Another way is to
divide the image into different regions and calculate color
features for each region. Dividing image into sub-images
(blocks) and extracting useful information from these blocks
is a way for improving color histogram and attending to
homogenous blocks seems to be effective. A Histogram
counts the number of pixels of each kind and can be rapidly
created by reading each image pixel just once and
incrementing the appropriate bin of the histogram. Color
histograms are relatively invariant to translation, rotation
about the imaging axis, small off-axis rotation, scale changes
and partial occlusion.
II. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
As we know that local features are the image patterns
which differ from its immediate neighbourhood. It is usually
affected by the change of an image property or several
properties simultaneously, although it is not necessary
localized exactly on these changes. There are mainly three
properties commonly considered as intensity, color, and
texture. Local features can be points, but also edges or small
image patches. Typically, some measurements are taken from
a region centered on a local feature and converted into
descriptors. The descriptor scan then is used for various
applications. Good features should have the following
properties:
D

A. Uniqueness / Informativeness
The strength patterns underlying the discovered features
should show a lot of variation, such that features can be
distinguished and matched.
B. Repeatability
Given two images of the same objector view, taken under
different viewing conditions, a high percentage of the features
noticed on the scene part observable in both images should be
found in both images.
C. Vicinity
The features should be limited, so as to decrease the
probability of occlusion and to permit simple model estimates
of the geometric and photometric deformations between two
images taken under different viewing circumstances.
D. Accurateness
The detected features should be accurately localized, in
both image location, with respect to scale and possibly shape.
E. Effectiveness
Preferably, the recognition of features in a new image
should allow for time-critical applications. Repeatability,
debatably the most significant property of all, can be achieved
in two different ways: either by invariance or by robustness.
F. Magnitude
The number of detected features should be satisfactorily
large, such that a sensible number of features are detected
even on small objects. However, the optimal number of
features depends on the application. Ideally, the number of
identified features should be controllable over a large range by
a simple and intuitive threshold. The density of features
should reflect the information content of the image to provide
a compact image representation.
G. Robustness
In case of relatively small deformations, it often suffices to
make feature detection methods less sensitive to such
deformations, i.e., the accuracy of the detection may decrease
but not drastically. Also geometric and photometric deviations
from the mathematical model used to obtain invariance are
often overcome by including more robustness.
H. Invariance
When large deformations are to be projected, the preferred
approach is to model these mathematically if possible, and
then develop methods for feature detection that are unaffected
by these mathematical transformations.
III. CLASSIFICATION OVERVIEW
Classification is a partitions an image into distinct regions
containing each pixel with similar attributes. It is to be
meaningful and useful for image analysis and interpretation
should strongly relate to depicted objects or features of
interest. Meaningful classification is the first step from low-
level image processing transforming a grayscale or color
image into one or more other remote sensing images to high-
level image description in terms of features, objects, and
scenes. The success of image analysis depends on reliability
of classification, but an accurate partitioning of an image is
generally a very challenging problem of remote sensing image
applications.
Classification techniques are either contextual or non-
contextual. There is no account of spatial relationships
between features in an image and group pixels together on the
basis of some global attribute, e.g. gray level or color.
Contextual techniques additionally exploit these relationships,
e.g. group together pixels with similar gray levels and close
spatial locations.The division of remote sensing image into
meaningful structures and image classification is often an
essential step in image analysis, object representation,
visualization and many other image processing tasks. A great
variety of classification methods has been proposed in the past
decades and some categorization is necessary to present the
methods properly derived. The categorization presented in this
paper is therefore rather a categorization regarding the
emphasis of an approach than a strict division.
IV. CLUSTERING METHOD
Clustering is a grouping of data with similar
characteristics. This "similarity" in a given set may vary
according to data, because clustering is used in various fields
such as numerical taxonomy, morphometric, systematic, etc.
Thus, a clustering algorithm that fits the numerical measure of
optimization in a data may not optimize another set of data
(for example, depending on the units selected). There are
many algorithms to solve a clustering problem. The
algorithms used in the applet concentrate on "joining",
"splitting", and "switching" search methods. The clustering
method uses a three dimensional model for demonstration
purposes. However the algorithms can calculate clusters in n-
dimensions. For planning to an algorithm based on principal
component analysis, projecting the n-dimensional data on to a
three dimensional space. There are many methods of
clustering developed for wide variety of purposes. Clustering
algorithms used for unsupervised classification of remote
sensing data vary according to the efficiency with which
clustering takes place. Clustering is divided into hierarchical
clustering and non-hierarchical clustering.
V. FEATURE EXTRACTION USING LAB COLOR SPACE
The characteristics of the LAB color space make it
suitable for extracting global color features from a digital
satellite image. Therefore it convert the analyzed RGB images
into LAB format. The characteristic known as luminance or
intensity is represented on the axis named L, that is
perpendicular on a pile of “ab” planes, each one containing all
the possible colors for a given luminance. One of the most
useful characteristic of the LAB color space is that the colors

are uniformly distributed in an “ab” plane, from green to red
along the“a” axis and from blue to yellow along the “b” axis
shown in figure 1. One color is defined by a point (a1, b1) in
an “ab” plane of a given luminance L, and colors are changing
gradually and uniformly in the plane around the point. It is
important that the human eye perceives this gradual change of
color as a uniform one. The values of the coordinates L, a and
b are real numbers when applying RGB to LAB mathematical
conversion, but, these values are mapped to 256 levels.
Fig. 1: Color Distribution in “ab” plane for L=134
A precise color is defined in the LAB color space by a
triplet (L,a,b),much like a triplet (R,G,B) defines a color in the
RGB color space. However, in LAB the pair (a,b) can be
viewed as a pure color and the L coordinate gives only how
darker or lighter that color is seen by the human eye. A
reduction of the number of colors is needed in order to obtain
global characteristics. Therefore, it take into consideration
each quadrant of an “ab” plane as an independent subset of
colors. It is ok to consider quadrants for a global case of
classifying or retrieving images based on their color content.
However, for dedicated applications it would be possible to
split the “ab” planes in more complicated shapes in order to
depict some specific colors. Then the (a,b) pairs are ordered
according to the values in the bins, the colors with a greater
number of corresponding pixels in the image being on top of
the list. Then colors very close in the “ab” planes are merged
in this lists, which became a list of fewer colors, but with
larger counts of pixels. Finally, the top (a,b) pair is taken as
the most important color in the corresponding quadrant.
Collecting all the 32 important colors provides us the
following feature vector in classification process.
Each column matrix represents a winning (ai, bi) color
pair. The color contents of two images can be easily compared
on the base of the color features extracted as above. It is
essential to use the fact that the 32 components of the feature
matrix in fact 32 pairs of coordinates designating points in an
“ab” plane of the LAB color system. This techniques is used
to analyze the Euclidean distance as a metric for color feature
vectors. It assures that comparing two color components of
two images means comparing the distance between two points
in the same “ab” plane and the same quadrant.
VI. FEATURE EXTRACTION
The feature is defined as a function of one or more
measurements, each of which specifies some quantifiable
property of an object, and is computed such that it quantifies
some significant characteristics of the object. For classify the
various features currently employed are as follows:
A. General Features
Application independent features such as color, texture,
and shape. According to the abstraction level, they can be
further divided in to the following:
Pixel-level Features - Features calculated at each pixel,
e.g. color, location.
Local Features - Features calculated over the results of
subdivision of the image band on image classification or edge
detection.
Global Features - Features calculated over the entire
image or just regular sub-area of an image.
Domain Specific Features - Application dependent
features such as human faces, fingerprints, and conceptual
features. These features are often a synthesis of low-level
features for a specific domain. On the other hand, all features
can be coarsely classified in to low-level features and high-
level features. Low-level features can be extracted directed
from the original images, whereas high-level feature
extraction must be based on low level features. The feature
extraction diagram is shown in the following fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Diagram of Feature Extraction processing Based
on Clustering Approach
B. Color Features
The color feature is one of the most widely used visual
features in image retrieval. Images characterized by color
features have many advantages:
Robustness - The color histogram is invariant to rotation of
the image on the view axis, and changes in small steps when
rotated otherwise or scaled. It is also insensitive to changes in
image and histogram resolution and occlusion.
Effectiveness - There is high percentage of relevance
between the query image and the extracted matching images.
Implementation Simplicity - The construction of the color
histogram is a straightforward process, including scanning the
image, assigning color values to the resolution of the

histogram, and building the histogram using color components
as indices.
Computational Simplicity - The histogram computation
has O(X, Y ) complexity for images of size X × Y . The
complexity for a single image match is linear, O(n), where n
represents the number of different colors or resolution of the
histogram.
Low Storage Requirements - The color histogram size is
significantly smaller than the image itself, assuming color
quantization.
Typically, the color of an image is represented through
some color model. There exist various color models to
describe color information. One representation of color
content of the image is by using color histogram. Statistically,
it denotes the joint probability of the intensities of the three
color channels. A feature vector is then formed by
concatenating the three channel histograms into one vector.
Color descriptors of images can be global or local and consist
of a number of histogram descriptors and color descriptors
represented by color moments, color coherence vectors. Color
histogram describes the distribution of colors within a whole
or within an interest region of image. So, the computational
complexity of the co-occurrence matrix depends quadratically
on the number of gray-scales used for quantization. Features
can be extracted from the co-occurrence matrix to reduce
feature space dimensionality and the formal definitions of five
features from the co-occurrence matrix are done.
VII. PROPOSED AUTOMATIC FEATURE VECTOR
CLASSIFICATION APPROACH
The normal feature vector classification algorithms
used in these systems are commonly divided into three tasks
such as extraction, selection and classification. The extraction
task transforms rich content of images into various content
features. Feature extraction is the process of generating
features to be used in the selection and classification tasks.
Feature selection reduces the number of features provided to
the classification task. Those features which are likely to assist
in discrimination are selected and used in the classification
task. Of these three activities, feature extraction is most
critical because the particular features made available for
discrimination directly influence the efficacy of the
classification task. The end result of the extraction task is a set
of features, commonly called a feature vector, which
constitutes a representation of the image. This process can be
divided in the following stages:
A. Preprocessing
The image is first processed in order to extract the
features, which describe its contents. The processing involves
filtering, normalization, segmentation and object
identification. The output of this stage is a set of significant
regions and objects.
B. Feature Extraction
Features such as shape, texture, color, etc. are used to
describe the content of the image. Image features can be
classified into primitives.
In this paper, an automatic unsupervised feature
vector classification technique is proposed. The clustering
approach groups the N computed feature vectors, V(Ii)…..V(IN)
in a number of K color classes. The provided method uses a
sequence of K-Means clustering procedures and identifies the
optimal number of clusters using a validation index. The K-
Means algorithm represents an unsupervised method for
cluster analysis that aims to partition N observations into K
clusters in which each observation belongs to the cluster with
the nearest mean. The following objective function has to be
minimized by the K-Means procedure, as a within-cluster sum
of squares:
Where d is the Euclidian distance, Ci is the centroid of the
current cluster and Ind(Ci) represents the set of indices of
pixels corresponding to the feature vectors from that cluster.
The clustering procedure containing the following steps:
Procedure: An Automatic Color Feature Vector
Classification
Step 1: Initialize K centroids, one for each cluster, each centroid
representing a point in the feature vector space.
Step 2: Each image feature vector is associated to the closest
centroid
Step 3: The centroids of the obtained clusters are recomputed, as
means of the contained feature vectors
Step 4: Steps 2 and 3 are repeated until the centroids of classes no
longer change their positions
Step 5: The optimal number of clusters is determined to maximize
the inter-cluster distances and minimize the intra-cluster distances
Step 6: Finally to get different level of clustering image
Table 1: Algorithm for an Automatic Color Feature Vector
Classification Approach

The number K that maximizes the Dunn index is
considered the optimal number of clusters. The main
advantage of Dunn index is its linear time complexity, the
main disadvantage being the vulnerability for noise in the
data. Therefore, if they obtained image feature vector classes,
for a given K, are Cl1….ClK, then the optimal number of
clusters is computed as:
The Ci being the centroid of the cluster Cli and d(Cli) the
intra-cluster distance of that cluster, representing the
absolute/squared distance between all pairs of cluster
elements. As seen in the Eqn. 7, the K-Means algorithm is
executed N times for determining the optimal number of
clusters. If the number of images is very high, the
computational cost increases very much, therefore it could use
a lower number of running times.
VIII. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Numerous experiments have been performed on satellite
image using this color-based image classification technique.
This type of satellite image classification was implemented
using MATLAB version 7.6 software. The complete process
of this algorithm standards are summarized in the following
Fig. 3.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
(g) (h)
(i) (j)
(k)
Fig. 3. Resultant Satellite Image, a. Original Satellite image, b. Image for
Cluster Label Index 1, c. Image for Cluster Label Index 2, d. Image for

Cluster Label Index 3, e. Image for Cluster Label Index 4, f. Image for Cluster
Label Index 5, g. Image Cluster 1, h. Image Cluster 2, i. Image Cluster 3, j.
Image Cluster 4 and k. Image Cluster 5
IX. CONCLUSION
A machine vision approach for color images are
presented in this article. The study has brought original
contributions in both feature extraction and classification
stages. It also proposes an automatic color feature extraction
approach using clustering. Some robust color based feature
vectors, based on clustering coordinates in the color space are
obtained. Next, an automatic feature vector classification
technique has been provided. It uses a sequence of K-
Means procedure and a validation index that computes the
optimal number of clusters. The results described successfully
applied in the image retrieval and indexing domains. The
unsupervised image recognition method could be used in the
automatic development of a cluster based image index. It
developed some color based image indexing and extracting
techniques and improving the new color feature vectors results
have been obtained.
REFERENCES
[1]. Balaji T., and Sumathi M., “Fast and Efficient Classification
Algorithm for FCM Clustering in Remote Sensing Images”,
IJISET, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 124–130, May 2014.
[2]. Balaji T., amd Sumathi M., “Relational Color Features of Remote
Sensing Image Classification Using Dynamic Global Threshold
Method”, International Conference Proceedings, ICRSI, Gujarat,
pp. 29-34, December 2013.
[3]. Balaji T., and Sumathi M., “Relational Features of Remote
Sensing Image Classification Using Effective K-Means
Clustering”, IJoART, Vol. 8, Issue 8, pp. 103–107, August 2013.
[4]. Poulami Haldar and Joydeep Mukherjee, “Content Based Image
Retrieval Using Histogram, Color and Edge”, International
Journal of Computer Applications, pp 25-31, 2012.
[5]. Dr. H.B.Kekre ,MR.Dhirendra Mishra, MS. Stuti narula and MS.
Vidhi Shah , “Color Feature Extraction for CBIR”, International
Journal of Engineering Science & Technology (IJEST), pp. 8357-
8365, 2011.
[6]. Ciobanu A., Costin M., Barbu T., “Extraction of Main Colors from
a Digital Color Image”, Proceedings of the International
Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference, Vol. 1, pp.
1069−1076, 2010.
[7]. A. Ciobanu, M. Costin, T. Barbu, “Extraction of Main Colors
From A Digital Color Image”, Proc. of International
Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference, Vol. 1, pp.
1069-1076, 2010.
[8]. Barbu T., Ciobanu A., “Color-Based Image Retrieval Technique
Using Relevance Feedback”, Proceedings of Third International
Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence,
Vol. 4, pp. 105−108, 2009.
[9]. Kanungo T., Mount D.M., Netanyahu N.S., Piatko C.D.,
Silverman R., Wu A.Y., “An Efficient K-Means Clustering
Algorithm: Analysis and Implementation”, IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp.
881−892, 2009.
[10]. Ying Liua, Dengsheng Zhanga, Guojun Lua and WeiYing Mab,
“A Survey of Content Based Image Retrieval With High-Level
Semantics", Pattern Recognition, Elsevier, pp 262-282, 2009.
[11]. M. Castrillon-Santana and Q. C. Vuong, “An Analysis of
Automatic Gender Classification”, In Proceedings of Conference
on Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis and
Applications, pp. 271–280, 2009.
[12]. F. Scalzo, G. Bebis, M. Nicolescu, and L. Loss, “Feature Fusion
Hierarchies for Gender Classification”, In Proceedings of
International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2008.
AUTHOR PROFILES
Dr. T. Balaji received post graduate degree
(M.C.A.) in 1999 from Alagappa University,
Karaikudi, M.Phil. degree in 2003 from
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
Tirunelveli, M.Tech. degree in 2007 from
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University,
Tirunelveli and Ph.D. (Computer Science)
degree in 2016 from Madurai Kamaraj
University, Madurai, TamilNadu. He is
having 16 years of experience in teaching.
He is working as an Assistant Professor at
Govt. Arts College, Melur for the last 10
years. His areas of interest are Medical
Image Processing, Signal Processing,
Remote Sensing and Image Classification.
He has published and presented over 20
research papers in international and national
journals of repute. As an educationist he has
conceptualized and implemented a new
curriculum with encrusted learning,
energetic work and exploration project as a
part of under graduate education and post
graduate education.

An Automatic Color Feature Vector Classification Based on Clustering Method

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to An Automatic Color Feature Vector Classification Based on Clustering Method (20)

More from RSIS International (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

An Automatic Color Feature Vector Classification Based on Clustering Method