Analysis of mysql and postgresql
0 likes1,463 views
This document analyzes MySQL and PostgreSQL across several metrics for selecting a database for Echelon. PostgreSQL offers more advanced features and stronger data integrity but is slower. MySQL is faster but offers fewer features and weaker integrity. For Echelon, the document recommends developing cloud applications in PostgreSQL despite potential delays, as it outperforms MySQL overall and is more suitable for complex databases.
Analysis of mysql and postgresql
- 1. Analysis of MySQl and PostgreSQL for Echelon Prepared by : Asif Imran (Cloud Guru v3) Presented by: Farhan Israque Khan Prepared for: Core team of Echelon
- 2. Metrics considered for Analysis • Features • Support • Ease of Use • Stability • Speed
- 3. Features: Data Storage • PostgreSQL • Is fairly straightforward • Uses Postgre Storage System as the only storage mechanism. • MySQL • offers a multitude of database storage systems, such as InnoDB and DBD. • While this offers a greater choice of features, it can be a source of confusion and increased learning curve
- 4. Features: Data Integrity • Database integrity is a critical feature that differentiates between both databases. • An important qualification that insures database integrity is the ACID test. • ACID is an acronym that stands for atomicity, consistency, isolation and durability. • These are four properties of a robust database system that are scoped to a transaction.
- 5. • A database that is ACID-compliant: • Either commits the whole information to the database if the transaction is successful • Or writes nothing in the event of an abnormal transaction. • Both Databases are ACID-compliant: • but there is a marked difference in the scope of transaction functionality compliance. Features: Data Integrity
- 6. Features: Data Integrity • PostgreSQL is fully ACID-compliant • MySQL offers compliance only at the default table handler level: Not good enough • MySQL: • The standard table handler does not support consistency, durability or isolation. • In order to insure database integrity you have to either download a version in which these handlers are specifically compiled or compile the database yourself after enabling these handlers.
- 7. Advanced Database Features • When it comes to Advanced Database Features • PostgreSQL • Is by far the most sophisticated amongst the two. • PostgreSQL, on the other hand, offers a full set of advanced features and sophisticated methods. • MySQL • In its early days was built on the premise of the 20 / 80 rule: Only 20-percent of all SQL capabilities are required for 80 percent of database applications. • As such, MySQL has sought to provide only a reasonable set of features, excluding those deemed surplus to requirements.
- 8. Replication • Both database applications support Replication • Format: single-master and multi-level replication scenarios. • Additional replication methods for multi-slave and multi-master scenarios, as well as third-party replication are also available for PosgreSQL.
- 9. SQL Programming and Syntax • The basic statements, such as SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT and DELETE are the same • Once we step beyond the fundamentals, there is a different implementation, syntax and supported features. • PostgreSQL • Supports a richer SQL language than MySQL and this is no more evident than the support for SQL Subqueries. Subqueries can perform complex set manipulations and let data sets interact with each other in a sophisticated way.
- 10. Area of Application • It all depends on your own needs and your development background. • If we are after a database to prop-up a Web blog with basic functionality, then MySQL is easier to use with just about the right functionality.
- 11. Area of Application • PostgreSQL’s extra features effective for large systems. • For a complex database system PosgreSQL is easier to use. • Hallmark features such as subqueries, unions, triggers and consistent procedures are essential for the development of such databases. • Such functionality is complex and awkward to write in MySQL.
- 12. Speed • MySQL has been designed to be a fast database. • It is indeed faster than the fully-featured PostgreSQL. • For example, MyISAM tables are very lightweight and make for and extremely speedy performance.
- 13. Stability • Both database systems claim a large level of stability in their new releases. • Stability becomes an issue in heavy environments. • In such a setting, both DBMS fare differently depending on the features in use. For example, MySQL would be more stable where replication is used since this feature has long been implemented in the database. • Conversely, PostgreSQL’s advanced set of features, such as stored procedures and subqueries, have been implemented for longer and as such are more likely to be stable.
- 14. Conclusion • For Echelon we should look into how to manage the cloud in PostgreSQl without significant delay. • In addition, suggestion would be to develop the applications that will run on the cloud on PostgreSQL since it outperforms MySQL in almost all sectors. • Timeline should be set by when the implementation of cloud on PostgreSQL will be achieved.