Comparison of Relational Database and Object Oriented Database

Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 1.711
International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering
and Research
www.ijmter.com
@IJMTER-2014, All rights Reserved 27
e-ISSN: 2349-9745
p-ISSN: 2393-8161
Comparison of Relational Database and Object Oriented
Database
Rutija S. Ghongade1
, Prof. P J. Pursani2
Final CSE Student, HVPM’s COET Amravati1
Assistant Professor, CSE Dept., HVPM’s COET Amravati2
Abstract—The object-oriented database (OODB) is the combination of object-oriented
programming language (OOPL) systems and persistent systems. Object DBMSs add database
functionality to object programming languages. They bring much more than persistent
storage of programming language objects. A major benefit of this approach is the unification
of the application and database development into a seamless data model and language
environment. This report presents the comparison between object oriented database and
relational database. It gives advantages of OODBMS over RDBMS. It gives applications of
OODBMS.
I. INTRODUCTION
A structured collection of records is known as Database. The way in which database
is structured is defined as Database Model, Hierarchical model, Network model, Object
model and Relational model are some of the commonly used models database in the structure
of database. A database facilities an organized storage of data in the form of records. The
record can be queried in different ways to retrieve information from database. Owning to an
organized storage of data a database becomes a useful tool of data storage. Database form any
basic tier of any multi-tier system. The information handled and manipulated by the other
layers of an n-system basically stored in structured manner in database[6-12]
.
(RDBMS - relational database management system) A database based on the
relational model developed by E.F. Codd. A relational database allows the definition of data
structures, storage and retrieval operations and integrity constraints. In such a database the
data and relations between them are organized in tables. A table is a collection of records and
each record in a table contains the same fields[6-12]
.
Properties of Relational Tables:
• Values Are Atomic
• Each Row is Unique
• Column Values Are of the Same Kind
• The Sequence of Columns is Insignificant
• The Sequence of Rows is Insignificant
• Each Column Has a Unique Name

International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research (IJMTER)
Volume 01, Issue 05, [November - 2014] e-ISSN: 2349-9745, p-ISSN: 2393-8161
Object DBMSs add database functionality to object programming languages. They bring
much more than persistent storage of programming language objects. Object DBMSs extend
the semantics of the object oriented programming languages to provide full-featured database
programming capability. According to Rao (1994), "The object-oriented database (OODB)
paradigm is the combination of object-oriented programming language (OOPL) systems and
persistent systems. The power of the OODB comes from the seamless treatment of both
persistent data, as found in databases, and transient data, as found in executing program.[1-5]
II. OBJECT ORIENTED DATABASE
Object oriented databases are also called Object Database Management Systems
(ODBMS). Object databases store objects rather than data such as integers, strings or real
numbers. Objects are used in object oriented languages such as Smalltalk, C++, Java, and
others. Objects basically consist of the following:
Attributes - Attributes are data which defines the characteristics of an object. This data may
be simple such as integers, strings, and real numbers or it may be a reference to a complex
object.
Methods - Methods define the behavior of an object and are what was formally called
procedures or functions.
In contrast to a relational DBMS where a complex data structure must be flattened out
to fit into tables or joined together from those tables to form the in-memory structure, object
DBMSs have no performance overhead to store or retrieve a web or hierarchy of interrelated
objects. This one-to-one mapping of object programming language objects to database
objects has two benefits over other storage approaches: it provides higher performance
management of objects, and it enables better management of the complex interrelationships
between objects. This makes object DBMSs better suited to support applications such as
financial portfolio risk analysis systems, telecommunications service applications, World
Wide Web document structures, design and manufacturing systems, and hospital patient
record systems, which have complex relationships between data[1-5]
.
• Object Persistence
With traditional databases, data manipulated by the application is transient and data in the
database is persisted (Stored on a permanent storage device). In object databases, the
application can manipulate both transient and persisted data.
III. ADVANTAGES OF OBJECT ORIENTED DATABASE
• Capable to handle many different types of data types:
An object oriented database can store any type of data including text, numbers,
pictures, video and voice.
• Combination of object oriented programming and database technology:
The object oriented database technology combines object oriented programming with
the database technology to provide an integrated application development system. There are
many advantages of including the definition of operations with the definition of data. First the

operations which are defined are applied and are not depending on the specific database
application running at the moment. Second the data types can be extended to support
complex data.
• Improves productivity:
Inheritance allows programmers to develop solutions to complex problems by
defining the new objects in terms of defined objects in the past. Polymorphism and dynamic
binding allows programmers to define operations for one object and then to share the
specification of the operation with other object. These objects can further extend this
operation to provide behaviors that are unique to those objects.
• Data access:
Object oriented databases represent relationships explicitly supporting both
navigational and associative access to information.
• Enriched modeling capabilities:
The object oriented data mode allows the ‘real world’ to be modeled more closely. The
objects which encapsulates both state and behavior is more natural and realistic
representation of real world objects. An object can store all relationships that it has with other
objects including many-to-many relationships and objects can be formed into complex
objects that the traditional data model cannot cope with easily.
• Extensibility:
OODBMSs allow new data types to be built from existing data types. The ability to factor
out common properties of several classes and form them into a super class that can be shared
with subclass can greatly reduce redundancy within system is regarded that one of the main
advantage of object orientation. Further, the reusability of classes promotes faster
development and easier maintenance of database and its applications.
• Removal of Impedance mismatch:
A single language between Data Manipulation Language (DML) and the programming
language overcomes the Impedance mismatch. This eliminates many of the efficiencies that
occur in mapping a declarative language such as SOL to an imperative language ‘C’.
• More expressive query language:
Navigational access is the most common form of data access in OODBMSs. This is in
contrast to a associative access of SQL(that is, declarative statement with selection based on
one or more predicates).Navigational explosion is suitable for handling parts explosion,
recursive queries and so on.
• Support for schema evolution:
The tight coupling between data and applications in OODBMSs makes schema evolution
more feasible.

• Applicability to advanced database applications:
There are many areas where traditional DBMSs have not been used, such as Computer
Aided Design (CAD), Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE), Office Information
System (OIS), and Multimedia systems. The enriched modeling capabilities of OODBMSs
have made them suitable for these applications.
• No Primary Keys:
The user of an RDBMS has to worry about uniquely identifying tuples by their values and
making sure that no two tuples have the same primary key values to avoid error conditions. In
an OODBMS, the unique identification of objects is done behind the scenes via OIDs and is
completely invisible to the user. Thus there is no limitation on the values that can be stored in
an object.
IV. COMPARISON WITH RELATIONAL DATABASE
• Comparison of OODBMS and RDBMS
Table 1. Comparing OODBMS and RDBMS as far as data modeling is concerned.
Object Oriented model Relational model Differences
Object Entity The object specifies behavior
too
Class of Objects Types of Entities The class of objects includes
the common behavior of
objects in that class
Class hierarchy The database schema The class hierarchy includes
inheritance, while the scheme
use the external keys
Class instance Entity, tuple or record The instance may have a more
restrictive activity
Object identifier(OID) Primary key In the relational model
primary key is not identified
by the system

Table 2. Comparing OODBMS with RDBMS considering their objectives.
V. LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Comparison of RDBMS, OODBMS and ORDBMS[1]
:
In this paper author has presented the similarities and differences between relational
modeling of data and the object oriented modeling of data is of great importance both for
database designers and for users. By being well acquainted with the relational model and by
noting the similarities and differences between the two approaches to data modeling,
designers will be able to turn into account and to make use of the already acquired experience
as an important basis for under-standing and learning the methodology of designing object
oriented databases.
2. Comparison Between Object-Relational and Object-Oriented Database[2]
:
The author of this paper discuss some concepts related to the object-relational and object-
oriented database system such as object identity, user defined types(UDTs), user-defined
routines, polymorphism, subtypes and super types, persistent stored modules, and large
objects. At the end of this paper exist comparison between ORDBMS and OODBMS.
3. Performance Comparison of Relational Database with Object Database DB4O[3]
:
The author of this paper discusses object oriented approach for solving queries. The queries
executed and specifically on an object oriented database DB4o. The paper also discusses two
factors namely querying methodology and performance analysis in comparison with
traditional DBMS like MYSQL. The proposed approach proves that OODBMS is more
efficient compare to RDBMS.
VI. APPLICATIONS OF OBJECT ORIENTED DATABASE
Object databases work well with:
• CAS Applications (CASE-computer aided software engineering, CAD-computer
aided design, CAM-computer aided manufacture)
• Multimedia Applications
• E-Commerce
OODBMS RDBMS
Main Objectives: data encapsulations and
independence.
Main Objective: ensuring data
independence from application
programs.
Independence of classes: classes can be recognized
without affecting the mode of using it.
Data independence: Data can be
recognized without affecting the
mode of using it.
OODBMS store data and methods. RDBMS store only data.
Encapsulations: the data can be used only through
their class methods.
Data partitioning: data can be
partitioned depending on the
requirements of the users and on the
specific user’s applications.
Complexity: the structure of data may be complex,
involving types of data.
Simplicity: users perceive data as
columns, rows/tuples and tables.

VI. REASONS OF NOT USING OBJECT ORIENTED DATABASE
PUBLICALLY
• Lack of Universal Data Model:
There is no universally agreed Data Model for OODBMS and most models lack of
theoretical foundation. This disadvantage is seen as significant drawback and is compared to
pre-relational system.
• Lack of Experience:
In comparison to RDBMSs the use of OODBMSs is relatively limited. This means that
we don’t have level of experience that we have with traditional system. OODBMSs are still
very much geared towards the programmer rather than native users. While the OODBMS is
limited to small niche market this problem will continue to use.
• Lack of Standards:
There is a general lack of standards of OODBMS. There is no standard Object Oriented
Query Language.
• People awareness about OODBMS:
People are not aware about the Object Oriented Database and therefore OOD had not
been expanded into the business field.
VII. CONCLUSION
It is difficult to represent and implement a variety of applications using relational
database technology because of the shortcomings .These applications include computer aided
design, engineering, software engineering and manufacturing systems (CAD, CAE, CASE,
and CAM); knowledge based systems multimedia systems that manage images, graphics,
voice, and textual documents; statistical and scientific modeling and analysis programs;
information systems; and so on. However, objects oriented technology, which is the
fundamental advancement in database technology, satisfies the objective of reducing the
difficulty of designing and implementing very large and complex database requirements.
REFERENCES
[1][Georghe& Bucharest, 2007], Georghe and Bucharest “ Comparison of RDBMS, OODBMS and
ORDBMS”Journal of RevistaInformaticaEconomică,Vol.4 , No.44, 2007
[2] [Daniela & Mehmud , 2012], Daniela and Loie Naser Mehmud“Technical Institute of Sofia,
Bulgaria” , VOL.13,no 3(36), November 2012
[3] [Roopak et al., 2013], K. E. Roopak, K.S.Rao, S. Ritesh and S. Chickerur, “Performance
Comparison of Relational Database with Object Database DB4O”, IEEE 5thComputational
Intelligence Conference and Communication Networks(CICN), 2013.
[4] [Codd, 1970] Codd, E.F., 1970. A Relational Model for Large Shared Data Bank, CACM.
[5]Date, C.J., 1985. An Introduction to Database System, Addison Wesley.

[6]Lamb, C., G. Landis, J. Orenstein and D. Weinreb, 1991. The object store database system.
Commun.ACM, 34: 50-63.
[7]Mary, E.S.L., 1995. Object Databases: The Essentials, Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley.
[8]Mary, E.S.L., 1992. ODBMS vs. Relational. J. Object-Oriented Programming Focus on ODBMS,
pp: 35.
[9]Brodie, M., J. Mylopoulos and J. Schmidt, 1985.On Conceptual Modeling. Springer-Verlag.
[10]Atkinson, M., F. Bancilhon, D. DeWitt, K.Dittrich,D. Maier and S. Zdonik, 1989. The Object-
Oriented Database System Manifesto. Proc. First Intl. Conf. Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases,
Kyoto, Japan, pp: 223-40.
[11]Michael, S. and G. Kemnitz, 1991. The postgres next generation database management
system.Commun. ACM, 34: 78-92.
[12]Arthur, M.K., R. Jensen and S. Agarwal, 1993.Persistence software: Bridging object-oriented
programming and relational databases. Proc. ACM SIGMOD Intl. Conf. Management of Data,
Washington DC, pp: 523-528.

Comparison of Relational Database and Object Oriented Database

Comparison of Relational Database and Object Oriented Database

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (16)

Similar to Comparison of Relational Database and Object Oriented Database (20)

More from Editor IJMTER (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Comparison of Relational Database and Object Oriented Database