Efficient implementation of bit parallel finite

IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 | pISSN: 2321-7308
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 03 | Mar-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org 661
EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION OF BIT PARALLEL FINITE
FIELD MULTIPLIERS
Ajitha.S.S1
, Retheesh.D2
1
ME, Department of ECE, St.Xavier’s Catholic College of Engineering, Tamilnadu, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, Saveetha Engineering College, Tamilnadu, India
Abstract
Arithmetic in Finite/Galois field is a major aspect for many applications such as error correcting code and cryptography. Addition
and multiplication are the two basic operations in the finite field GF (2m
).The finite field multiplication is the most resource and time
consuming operation. In this paper the complexity (space) analysis and efficient FPGA implementation of bit parallel Karatsuba
Multiplier over GF (2m
) is presented. This is especially interesting for high performance systems because of its carry free property. To
reduce the complexity of Classical Multiplier, multiplier with less complexity over GF (2m
) based on Karatsuba Multiplier is used. The
LUT complexity is evaluated on FPGA by using Xilinx ISE 8.1i.Furthermore,the experimental results on FPGAs for bit parallel
Karatsuba Multiplier and Classical Multiplier were shown and the comparison table is provided. To the best of our knowledge, the
bit parallel karatsuba multiplier consumes least resources among the known FPGA implementation.
Keywords: Classical Multiplier, Cryptograph, FPGA, Galois field, Karatsuba Multiplier
----------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. INTRODUCTION
A finite field or Galois field is a field that contains only
finitely many elements. The finite fields are classified by size.
This classification specifies the order of the field. Notations
for the finite fields are GF (pm
) or Fp
m
, where the letters ―GF‖
stand for ―Galois field‖. The order or cardinal or number of
elements, of a finite field is of the form pm,
where p is a prime
number called the characteristic of the field and m is a positive
integer called the dimension of the field. Finite field arithmetic
operations in GF (2m
) were frequently desired in coding
theory, cryptography, digital signal processing. Coding theory
is an approach to various science disciplines such as
information theory, electrical engineering, data transmission,
mathematics and science, which helps design efficient and
reliable data transmission methods so that redundancy can be
removed and errors corrected.
Applications of cryptography include ATM cards, computer
passwords and e-commerce. Cryptography is the practice and
study of hiding information. Modern cryptography intersects
the disciplines of mathematics, computer science and
engineering. In these applications, multiplication is the most
common arithmetic. Thus it is desirable to design hardware-
efficient multiplier for GF (2m
) to meet the real time
requirement with minimum hardware complexity.
There are three popular types of bases over finite fields:
polynomial basis (PB), normal basis (NB) and dual basis
(DB). Basis is a set of vectors that, in a linear combination,
can represent every vector in a given vector space. Polynomial
basis is a mathematical function that is the sum of a number of
terms. Normal basis in field theory is a special kind of basis
for Galois extensions of finite degree, characterized as a
forming a single orbit for the Galois group. Dual basis is a set
of vectors that forms a basis for the dual space of a vector
space. One advantage of the normal basis is that the squaring
of an element is computed by a cyclic shift of the binary
representation. The dual basis multipliers require less chip
area than other two types.
The polynomial basis multipliers are widely used and lead to
efficient implementations of multipliers. As compared to other
two bases multipliers, the polynomial basis multipliers have
low design complexity and their sizes are easier to extend to
meet various applications due to their simplicity, regularity,
and modularity in architecture. It appears that polynomial
multipliers for classes of trinomials still achieve the lowest
circuit complexity
Arithmetic operations such as addition and multiplication are
the two basic operations in the finite field GF (2m
). Addition in
GF (2m
) is easily realized using m two-input XOR gates while
multiplication is costly in terms of gate count and time delay.
The other operations of finite fields, such as exponentiation,
division and inversion can be performed by repeated
multiplications. As a result there is a need to have fast
multiplication architecture with low complexity.
The hardware/software implementation efficiency of finite
field arithmetic is measured in terms of the associated space
and time complexities. The space complexity is defined as the
number of XOR and AND gates needed for the

__________________________________________________________________________________________
implementation of the circuit. The space and time
complexities of a multiplier heavily depend on how the field
elements are represented. Finite field multipliers with different
bases of representation have been realized to be used for
various applications. The polynomial basis multipliers are
more efficient and more widely used compared with
multipliers in the other bases of representations.
1.1 Related Work
C.Grabbe,M.Bednara,J.Teich, [1] presented four high
performance GF(2233) multipliers for an FPGA realization
and analyzed the time and area complexities. The finite field
elements are represented as polynomial basis and normal
basis. In polynomial basis, classical multiplier and Karatsuba
multipliers were designed.The advantage of classical
multiplier is regular structure and pipelined operation.The
disadvantage is high space complexity. In Karatsuba
multiplier the advantage is less number of gates are
required.The normal basis multipliers are Massey-Omura and
Sunar-Koc multiplier. The advantage of Massey-Omura is
high flexibility and Sunar-Koc is total number of gates are
reduced.
P.L.Montgomery,[2] presented Karatsuba Ofman algorithm
for multiplying two polynomials. Here multiplication of 5-
term, 6-term and 7-term polynomials are provided with scalar
multiplication of 13,17 and 22.Using 6-term polynomial only
leads to better asymptotic performance than standard
karatsuba.
C.Paar, [3] presented a new bit parallel structure for a
multiplier with low space complexity in Galois field is
introduced. Finite field of GF(2n
) is considered and field
extension of GF((2n
)m
). The field elements are represented in
the canonical base or in standard basis. Field of the form
GF((2n
)m
) are referred as composite field. Karatsuba Ofman
algorithm is used to multiply two polynomials effectively.
Advantages are complexity is reduced by introducing the
composite field. The main disadvantage is security is less and
does not have a regular structure.
C.Rebeirno and D.Mukhopadhyay, [4] presented a hybrid
technique which has a better area delay product. Masking
strategies are introduced to prevent power based side channel
attacks on the multiplier. SCAs are the biggest threat to
modern cryptography systems. In basic recursive KM, the
number LUTs required to combine the partial products is
much lower but it cannot applied directly to ECC. The hybrid
KM requires least resources as compared to other KMs used
for elliptic curve arithmetic; also it has a unique architecture.
Demerits are it is not efficient for FPGA platform as the
number of utilized LUTs is 65%.
A.Reyhani-Masoleh and A.Hasan, [5] presented a new bit
parallel structure for the polynomial basis multiplication
which is applicable to all type of irreducible binary
polynomial. The main advantage of this new formulation is
that it can be used with any field defining irreducible
polynomial. Then a bit parallel hardware architecture
generalization is provided. The architecture consist of two
parts IP network and Q network. The space and time
complexities are analysed as a function of reduction matrix Q.
the main advantage is only fewer number of lines are required
on the bus.
F.Rodriguez and C.K.Koc,[6] presented the Karatsuba-
Ofman Algorithm in which the degree of defining the
irreducible polynomial can be arbitrarily selected by the
designer allowing the usage of prime degrees. Here finite field
and composite field are considered. Composite multiplication
is performed by n-bit Karatsuba multiplier. The main
advantage is number of multiplication is reduced. The
composite field multiplication is performed by binary
Karatsuba multipliers. The advantage is improved gate
complexity .The disadvantage is wastage of several arithmetic
operation.
B.Sunar,[7] presented the subquadratic complexity multipliers
for even characteristic field extension. A short convolution
algorithm named Winograd short convolution algorithm were
designed to improve the space and time complexity. A certain
Winograd short convolutional algorithm is essentially
identical to the Karatsuba algorithm. The merits of Winograd
techniques are it can be easily built for any desired length; it is
simple and uniform construction. The main disadvantages are
appears to have less structure and cause additional wire delay
in VLSI implementation.
A.Weimerskirch and C.Paar, [8] presented the classical
Karatsuba algorithm for polynomial multiplication. Three
methods considered are digital method, Fast Fourier transform
method and Karatsuba method. The Karatsuba algorithm is
derived in two ways namely Chinese Remainder Theorem and
Simple Algebraic Transform KA is applied recursively if the
degree of polynomial is 2i
, where i>1 is a positive integer.
Advantage- squaring the polynomial is easily performed;
adding a dummy coefficients the complexity is reduced.
Disadvantage is a number of intermediate results have been
stored due to the recursive nature of KA.
J.VonzurGathen and J.Shokrollahi, [9] presented different
possibilities for implementing the Karatsuba multiplier for
polynomials over F2 on FPGA. Classical multiplier, Karatsuba
multiplier and a hybrid design were provided. The Karatsuba
multiplier has the lowest crossover point with the classical
algorithm. In hardware, the algorithmic and platform
dependent optimizations yield efficient designs. The resources
usage of polynomial multipliers is decreased by using both the
algorithmic and platform dependent method. The hybrid
design is used to minimize the total arithmetic cost and results
in significant area savings.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
G.Zhou, H.Michalik and L.Hinsenkamp, [10] addresses the
efficient and high throughput implementations of AES-GSM
optimized for FPGAs. The two main components in GCM are
an AES engine and a finite field multiplier over GF (2128
).The
complexity analysis presented is based on FPGA primitives
(LUTs). Modular multiplication consists of two steps: first a
classical multiplication and then a modular reduction. The
straight forward multiplier is used to get speed efficient design
while a Karatsuba multiplier is used to get an area efficient
design. Merits are reduced hardware complexity and high
throughput.
2. FINITE FIELD ARITHMETIC
Arithmetic in a finite field is different from standard integer
arithmetic. There are limited numbers of elements in the finite
field; all operations performed in the finite fields result in an
element within that field. While each finite field itself is not
infinite, there are infinitely many different finite fields; their
number of elements is necessarily of the form pn
. and the two
finite fields of the same size are isomorphic. An element α in
GF (2m
) can be represented as a polynomial, where αi € GF
(2m
).
Addition of two elements in GF (2m
) is performed as
polynomial addition in
GF (2m
)
Where + is XOR operation.
2.1 Addition and Multiplication In Finite Field
Addition and subtraction are performed by adding or
subtracting two of these polynomials together, and reducing
the result modulo the characteristic. In a finite field with
characteristic 2, addition and subtraction are identical, and are
accomplished using the XOR operator. When two polynomials
are added, each term is added independently; there is no
concept of a carry from one term to another.
Thus, Polynomial:
(x6
+ x4
+ x + 1) + (x7
+ x6
+ x3
+ x) = x7
+ x4
+ x3
+ 1
Binary: {01010011} + {11001010} = {10011001}
Hexadecimal: {53} + {CA} = {99}
Notice that under regular addition of polynomials, the sum
would contain a term 2x6
, but that this term becomes 0x6
and is
dropped when the answer is reduced modulo 2.
In binary representation, the coefficients can be only 1 or
0.When adding the coefficients, the following rule applies:
o 0+0=0
o 0+1=1
o 1+0=1
o 1+1=0(there is no carry)
Table-1: Polynomial Addition
Table-1 shows both the normal algebraic sum and the
characteristic 2 finite field sum of a few polynomials:
In computer science applications, the operations are simplified
for finite fields of characteristic 2, also called GF(2n
) Galois
fields, making these fields especially popular choices for
applications. The same logic that made addition become XOR
also applies to subtraction. The exclusive OR operation is
easier for digital logic than binary additions.
Multiplication in a finite field is multiplication modulo an
irreducible reducing polynomial used to define the finite field.
(i.e., it is multiplication followed by division using the
reducing polynomial as the divisor—the remainder is the
product.) The symbol "•" may be used to denote multiplication
in a finite field. Example: Rijndael's finite field
Rijndael uses a characteristic 2 finite field with 8 terms, which
can also be called the Galois field GF (28
). It employs the
following reducing polynomial for multiplication:
x8
+ x4
+ x3
+ x + 1.
For example, {53} • {CA} = {01} in Rijndael's field because
(x6
+ x4
+ x + 1)(x7
+ x6
+ x3
+ x) =
x13
+ x12
+ x9
+ x7
+ x11
+ x10
+ x7
+ x5
+ x8
+ x7
+ x4
+ x2
+ x7
+
x6
+ x3
+ x =
p1 p2
p1 + p2 (normal
algebra)
p1 + p2 in GF(2n
)
x3
+ x + 1 x3
+ x2
2x3
+ x2
+ x + 1 x2
+ x + 1
x4
+ x2
x6
+ x2
x6
+ x4
+ 2x2
x6
+ x4
x + 1 x2
+ 1 x2
+ x + 2 x2
+ x
x3
+ x x2
+ 1 x3
+ x2
+ x + 1 x3
+ x2
+ x + 1
x2
+ x x2
+ x 2x2
+ 2x 0

__________________________________________________________________________________________
x13
+ x12
+ x9
+ x11
+ x10
+ x5
+ x8
+ x4
+ x2
+ x6
+ x3
+ x =
x13
+ x12
+ x11
+ x10
+ x9
+ x8
+ x6
+ x5
+ x4
+ x3
+ x2
+ x
And
x13
+ x12
+ x11
+ x10
+ x9
+ x8
+ x6
+ x5
+ x4
+ x3
+ x2
+ x
modulo x8
+ x4
+ x3
+ x + 1 = (11111101111110 mod
100011011) = 1, which can be performed through long
division method
2.2 Classical Multiplier
The Classical multiplier is the simplest multiplier to perform
finite field multiplication. It is also called as paper and pencil
method or traditional method. To perform the classical
multiplication it requires only AND gates and XOR gates. The
number of AND gates required is n2
and (n-1)2
XOR gates,
where n is bit depth. The total gate complexity is 2n2
-1 and the
time complexity is TAND+(log2n)TXOR. Figure 1 shows the
calculation of the product of two 4-bit integer numbers given
by A3A2A1A0 (multiplicand) and B3B2B1B0 (multiplier).
A3 A2 A1 A0
B3 B2 B1 B0
A3.B0 A2.B0 A1.B0 A0.B0
A3.B1 A2.B1 A1.B1 A0.B1
A3.B2 A2.B2 A1.B2 A0.B2
A3.B3 A2.B3 A1.B3 A0.B3
S6 S5 S4 S3 S2 S1 S0
Fig-1: 4-bit multiplication
Each of the ANDed terms is referred to as a partial product.
The final product is obtained by summing each column of
partial products and is implemented using half adders.. If carry
comes, it must be propagated from the right to the left across
the columns. Adder that accepts a carry from the right must be
a full adder. 4-bit classical multiplier is shown in figure 2.
Fig -2 4-bit Classical Multiplier
The classical multiplier consists of AND gates, Full Adders
and Half adders. The 16 AND gates forms the sixteen partial
products. It is formed by ANDing all combinations of the four
multiplier bits with the four multiplicand bits. The column
sums are obtained using a combination of half and full adders.
The half adder blocks accept two bits to be added from the
top, carry out exits from the left of each block. The output
from the bottom of a block is the sum. The full adder accepts
two bits to be added from the top, any carry in from the right
and carryout exist from left of each block. The bottom of each
block gives the output. The least significant output bit, S0 is
computed as the product of two input bits A0 and B0.This
operation cannot generate a carry out. The next output bit, S1,
involves the sum of two partial products. A half adder is used
to form the sum since there can be no carry in from the first
column.
The third output bit, S2, is formed from the sum of three (1-
bit) partial products plus a possible carry in from the previous
bit. This operation requires two cascaded adders to sum the
four possible input bits (three partial products and one possible
carry in from the right). The remaining output bits are formed
similarly.
2.3 Karatsuba Multiplier
The Karatsuba algorithm is an efficient multiplication
algorithm. It reduces the multiplication of two n-digit numbers
to at most single digit multiplications. It is the fast
multiplication algorithm and at the same time it is the fast
computational algorithm. It uses the technique divide and
conquer technique. That is Karatsuba algorithm is applied to
large degree polynomials by splitting it into a lower and an
upper half. The algorithm becomes recursive if its applied
again to multiply these polynomial half’s.
The next iteration step splits these polynomial again in half.
The algorithm eventually terminates after t-steps. In the final
step the polynomial degenerates into single coefficients. This
recursive splitting of polynomials and the special reassembling
of the partial products ,drastically reduces the number of AND
gates to nlog
2
3
or n1.59
but the n umber of XOR gates increased
to 6nlog
2
3
-8n+2 which is very efficient when the polynomials
become large. But in GF(2n
), multiplication is a quite
expensive operation and an addition can be performed at
nearly no costs(since an XOR is very small on an FPGA and
no carry bits exist) .
For the modular multiplier, the straight forward multiplication
is used to get a speed efficient design, while the karatsuba
algorithm is used to get an area efficient design. But by
combining classical and Karatsuba, we get a high performance
and highly efficient multipliers. Squaring can be easily
performed by applying Karatsuba algorithm.

__________________________________________________________________________________________
In general consider two polynomials of degree m-1
m-1 m-1 m/2-1
A = ∑ αixi
= ∑ αixi
+ ∑ αixi
i=0 i=m/2 i=0
m/2-1 m/2-1
= xm/2
∑ αi+m/2xi
+ ∑ αixi
= xm/2
AH
+AL
i=0 i=0
and
m-1 m-1 m/2-1
B = ∑ bixi
= ∑ bixi
+ ∑ bixi
i=0 i=m/2 i=0
m/2-1 m/2-1
=xm/2
∑ bi+m/2xi
+ ∑ bixi
= xm/2
BH
+BL
i=0 i=0
The polynomial product is
C=xm
AH
BH
+(AH
BL
+AL
BH
) x(m/2)
+ AL
BL
.
To perform an n-bit multiplication we need an algorithm that
divides the n-bit multiplication into several one bit
multiplications, which are the only multiplications that can be
computed directly (i.e., by an AND-gate). With Karatsuba’s
divide and conquer multiplication algorithm, a multiplication
of two n-bit polynomials can be computed with three n=2-bit
multiplications and some additions (which are XOR’s in our
case) to determine interim results and accumulate the final
result. If n is four or more, the three multiplications in
Karatsuba's basic step involve operands with less than n digits.
Therefore, those products can be computed by recursive calls
of the Karatsuba algorithm. Figure 3 denotes 1-bit polynomial
karatsuba multiplier. ―.‖denotes multiplication in finite field.
Fig-3: one bit polynomial Karatsuba multiplier
Fig-4: 2- bit polynomial Karatsuba multiplier
Figure 4 shows the two bit polynomial Karatsuba multiplier
KM2.Here the dot represents the finite field multiplication
(AND gate ) and the plus represents the addition(XOR
gate).The two bit polynomial is derived from three one bit
polynomial Karatsuba multiplier KM1 in addition some
XOR gates are also used. Here a0,a1,b0,b1 are the coefficients
of the one degree polynomial and it is given as input to KM2 ;
c0,c1,c2 are the output of KM2.In normal classical multipliers
requires 4 AND gates and 3 XOR gates. But in Karatsuba
multiplier requires only 3 AND gates and 4 XOR gates. Thus
the space complexity of the multiplier is reduced.
Fig-5: 4- bit polynomial Karatsuba multiplier

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Figure 5 shows the 4- bit polynomial Karatsuba multiplier
KM4. Here the dot represents the finite field multiplication
(AND gate) and the plus represents the addition (XOR gate).
The 4-bit polynomial is derived from three 2-bit polynomial
Karatsuba multiplier KM2 in addition some XOR gates are
also used.
3. RESULTS
In this paper, finite field multipliers are developed and is
simulated using Xilinx ISE 8.1i in Verilog. It is synthesized
using Xiinx Virtex 4, device Xe3VS500E (package FT250,
speed grade -4) and the comparison results are extracted from
the synthesis report.
The simulated waveform for the classical multiplier is shown
in figure 6. Here the inputs are a= 0101 and b= 1000. The
output is c=101000.
Fig-6: simulated waveform for classical multiplier
The simulated Waveform for Karatsuba Multiplier is shown in
figure 7. The inputs given area=1111 and b=0100. The output
is c=111100
Fig-7: simulated waveform for Karatsuba multiplier
Table-2: Comparison of 4-bit Multipliers
Multiplier
No.of 4-input
LUTs
Total Memory Usage
(kb)
No.of Slices
Delay
(ns)
No. of bonded
IOBs
Classical Multiplier 29 118448 17 13.812 16
Karatsuba Multiplier 11 117424 6 7.563 15

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 2 shows the comparative results of both classical and
Karatsuba multipliers. From the table, karatsuba multiplier
consumes less space than the classical multiplier.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Finite field multipliers play a very important role in the areas
of digital communication especially in the areas of
cryptography, error control coding and digital signal
processing. In this paper, two multipliers namely classical and
Karatsuba multipliers were simulated. The comparison results
show that Karatsuba multiplier is more efficient than the other
multiplier. Using Karatsuba multiplier we can improve the
performance of the process. The Karatsuba algorithm is an
optimization technique used for decomposing larger
multiplications into multiple smaller multiplications. This
feature allows the multiplier to be scaled easily.
REFERENCES
[1]. C.Grabbe,M.Bednara,J.Teich,J.von zur Gathen, and
J.Shokrollahi,‖FPGA designs of parallel high performance
GF(2233
) multipliers,‖ in Proc.Int.Symp.Circuits
Syst.(ISCAS),May 2003,pp.268-271.
[2]. P.L.Montgomery,‖Five,six,and seven-term Karatrsuba –
like formulae,‖IEEE Trans.Comput.,vol.54,no.3,pp.362-
369,Mar.2005.
[3]. C.Paar,‖A new architecture for a parallel finite field
multiplier with low complexity based on composite
fields,‖ IEEE Trans.Comput.,vol.45,no.7,pp.856-861,1996.
[4]. C.Rebeiro and D.Mukhopadhyay,‖Power attack resistant
efficient FPGA architecture for karatsuba multiplier,‖ in
Proc.Int.Conf.VLSI Des.,2008,pp.706-711 N.S.Kim,
T.Mudge, and R.Brown, ―A 2.3 Gb/s fully integrated and
synthesizable AES rinjdael core,‖ in proc. IEEE Custom
Integrated Circuits Conf., 2003, pp.193-196.
[5]. A.Reyhani-Masoleh and A.Hasan,‖Low complexity bit
parallel architecture for polynomial basis multiplication over
GF(2m
),‖ IEEE Trans.Comput.,vol.53,no.8,pp.945-
995,Aug.2004.
[6]. F.Rodriguez-Henriquez and C.K.Koc,‖On fully parallel
karatsuba multipliers for GF(2m
),‖in
Proceeding(394)Computer Sciences and
Technology.Cancun,Mexico:ACTA Press,2003Matthew
P.Young June 1, 2006 ―Basics of Elliptic curves‖.
[7]. B.Sunar,‖A generalization method for constructing
subquadratic complexity GF (2K
) multipliers,‖ IEEE
Trans.Comput.,vol.53,no.9,pp.1097-1105,sep.2004.
[8]. J.Von zur Gathen and J.Shokrollahi,‖Efficient FPGA-
based karatsuba multiplier for polynomials over F2 ,‖
Sel.Areas Cryptography,vol.LNCS 3897,pp.359-369,2005.
[9]. A.Weimerskirch & C.Paar, ― Generalizations of the
karatsuba algorithums for efficient
implementations,‖2006.[Online].Available:http://eprint.iacr.or
g/2006/224.pdfCharlie Kaufman,Radia Perlman and Mike
Speciner ‖Network Security,‖Second Edition, Prentice Hall
India.
[10]. G.Zhou & H.Michalik, ―Efficient and high-throughput
implementations of AES-Gcm on FPGAs‖ in
Proc.Int.Conf.FieldProgram.Technol.(ICFPT),Dec.2007,pp.18
5-192.

Efficient implementation of bit parallel finite

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot (16)

Viewers also liked (8)

Similar to Efficient implementation of bit parallel finite (20)

More from eSAT Journals (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Efficient implementation of bit parallel finite