PIXEL SIZE REDUCTION LOSS-LESS IMAGE COMPRESSION ALGORITHM

International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) Vol 5, No 2, April 2013
DOI : 10.5121/ijcsit.2013.5208 87
PIXEL SIZE REDUCTION LOSS-LESS IMAGE
COMPRESSION ALGORITHM
Pralhadrao V Shantagiri1
and Saravanan K N2
1
MPhil Scholar, Department of Computer Science, Christ University, Bangalore, India
gpralhadrao@gmail.com
2
Asst. Professor, Department of Computer Science, Christ University, Bangalore, India
saravanan.kn@christuniversity.in
ABSTRACT
The digital signal processing and multimedia Computing is used to produce and process a large number
images. Storing of raw image takes more space on storage device and more bandwidth over network during
transmission. Very few image compression algorithms exist in loss-less image compression category to
achieve compression ratio without transforming the image from the spatial domain. This paper proposes
new spatial domain loss-less image compression algorithm for synthetic color images of 24 bits. The
proposed algorithm does compression of an image by reducing the size of pixel. The size of pixel is reduced
by representing pixel using only required number of bits instead of 8 bits per color. The pre-processing step
takes care of re-valuing pixel based on occurrence to get better compression ratio. The proposed algorithm
has been applied on set of test images and the results obtained are encouraging. The compression ratio has
been compared with Huffman, TIFF, PPM-Tree, GPPM, PCX [19] and found better.
KEYWORDS
Pixel Size Reduction, Bits Per Pixel, Run Length Encoding, Huffman Encoder, Loss-less Image
Compression & Compression Ratio
1. INTRODUCTION
The process of reducing the amount of data needed for storage and transmission of given image
on storage place is image compression. The compression helps to reduce transmission bandwidth
in case of network or satellite transmission [1]. The proposed Pixel Size Reduction loss-less
image compression algorithm will retain the originality of an image when it is decompressed. We
have chosen synthetic images to validate the proposed algorithm but can be used to test images of
other types like photo, wallpaper, medical images, satellite images and etc.
The image is represented as a matrix of pixel value and each pixel for each color is represented in
integer value ranging from 0 to 255 occupying 8bits. The RGB image has 3 planes representing
three primary colours namely Red, Green and Blue color as components of an image. The test
images used to test the proposed algorithm are 24 bits colour.
2. PAGE LAYOUT
This paper is organized as follows. The next section, Section 3, describes the different image
compression methods and calculating CF of compressed image. In Section 4, we described the
proposed PSR algorithm steps for both encoding and decoding of an image.

88
In Section 5 shows the experimental results obtained by using proposed PSR algorithm and its
analysis. In Section 6 includes conclusion of research work carried out.
3. IMAGE COMPRESSION
The technological advancement in the field of information technology has led the development in
many fields. This includes Internet, Teleconferencing, Medical, Military, Multimedia, High
Definition Television Technologies, space, whether forecasting and etc. Because of this, the
quantity of image data being handled by computers has increased rapidly. This made need of
image compression, to save storage space, to reduce network bandwidth [1] consumption during
transmission of an image over network. The image compression helps to save space on storage
disks and also usage of Internet for transmission. The bigger image takes more time to transmit.
Hence, the need of an image compression.
3.1. REDUNDANCY IN AN IMAGE
Every image will have redundant data. The redundancy means duplication of information across
the image. Either it may be repeating pixel across the image or pattern, which is repeating more
frequently in the image. The image compression happens by taking advantage of this redundant
information [2,3] in the image. The redundancy is quality of every image irrespective of which
category that image belongs. Reduction of redundancy helps to achieve saving of storage space of
an image.
Neighbouring pixels are not statistically independent [3, 4]. It is due to the correlation between
the neighbouring pixels of an image. This is called Inter-pixel redundancy. If neighbouring pixels
are statistically correlated and they are not required to represent independently in am image, then
it becomes spatial redundancy in am image. In spatial redundancy, pixels are predicted from their
neighbours.
Another kind of redundancy in an image is coding redundancy, which is associated with the
representation of information in the form codes like Huffman, arithmetic and rice codes. These
codes must be efficient in order to compress the image effectively.
3.2. TYPES OF IMAGE COMPRESSION
The lossy and loss-less are types of image compression techniques. In general, lossy techniques
provide for greater compression ratios than loss-less techniques. The proposed algorithm belongs
loss-less technique. The loss-less compression can be one of the following:
• Predictive
• Transform based coding
• Dictionary based
• Ad hoc
The proposed algorithm falls under ‘ad-hoc’. The following are some of the loss-less compression
coding.

89
3.2.1. RUN LENGTH ENCODING
The basic algorithm in loss-less image compression used for sequential data. It is more suitable
for binary images. Usually consecutive pixels in a smooth region of an image are identical or the
small variation among them. It replaces sequences of pixels of same value with occurrence and
pixel [3]. The Run Length Encoding algorithm is briefly shown in Figure 1.
142 142 142 142 230 230 230 230 230 230 121 121 121 121
{142, 4} {230, 6} {121, 4}
Figure 1. Depicting Run-Length Encoding
3.2.2. STATIC HUFFMAN ENCODING
The idea behind Huffman static coding [4, 5] is, representing frequently occurring pixel in shorter
codeword instead of representing fixed length codeword based on frequency of each pixel. The
code words are stored in Huffman-Tree. Based on this tree, pixels are presented with shortest
code word as applicable.
3.2.3. ADAPTIVE HUFFMAN ENCODING
This is dynamic version of Huffman encoding technique and avoids preparation of frequency
table to know the occurrence of each pixel in an image at the beginning [6, 7]. It calculates as it
reads after each pixel. The frequency of each symbol is called weight of that symbol and this is
done at stage.
3.2.4. LEMPEL–ZIV–WELCH (LZW)
This is a dictionary based encoding. This algorithm basically replaces strings of pixels with single
codes and creates dynamic dictionary of codes without doing any analysis of the incoming data
[8, 22]. It keeps on updating table by adding every new string of pixels it reads. It outputs singe
code instead of string of pixels. The default size of table is 256 to hold pixel values from 0 to 255
for 8 bits. The table can be extended up to 4095 based on new pattern strings it forms in the
process. This can take up to 12 bits.
3.2.5. ARITHMETIC ENCODING
In this technique, instead of coding each symbol separately, whole image sequence is coded with
a single code [9]. The longer the message, the smaller the interval to represent the message
becomes. More probable symbols reduce the interval less than the less probable symbols and
hence add fewer bits in the encoded message. As a result, the coding result can reach to
Shannon’s entropy limit for a sufficiently large sequence of input symbols as long as the statistics
are accurate. Arithmetic coding is based on the following principle [10]. Given that
• The symbol alphabet is finite;
• All possible symbols sequences of a given length are finite;
• All possible sequences are count-ably infinite;
• The number of real numbers in the interval (0, 1) is unaccountably infinite; we can assign a
unique subinterval for any given input (sequence of symbols).

90
3.2.6. THE PEANO COUNT TREE (P-TREE)
This is a type of ad-hoc coding which is based on quad-tree concept [11]. The P-trees are a loss-
less, compressed, and data-mini-greedy data structure falling under spatial domain compression.
It recursively divide the entire spatial data into quadrants and record the count of 1-bits for each
quadrant, thus forming a quadrant count tree [12]. Using P-tree structure, all the count
information can be calculated quickly.
Pure-0 quadrant: Composed of only ZERO.
Pure-1 quadrant: Composed of only ONE.
The P-Tree loss-less compression helps to achieve better compression when more number of
consecutive 1’s and 0’s are present in the image in multiple of four.
3.2.7. THE PATTERN MASK TREE (PM-TREE)
It is an enhanced version of P-Tree, which masks, rather than counts, are used. In a PM-
tree, we use three-value logic to represent pure-1, pure-0, and mixed quadrants [14]. This
also belongs to quad-tree family. The mixed quadrant allows having better compression
rate compared to P-Tree.
3.2.8. THE PEANO PATTERN MASK TREE (PPM-TREE)
It is an enhanced version of PM-Tree, which uses four-value logic and the fourth logic to
represent pure-1, pure-0, mixed quadrants and P for pattern [14]. This pattern is dynamic values
depending on the tree constructed. In fact, the pattern state is a special case of a mixed state. The
dynamic pattern P helps to achieve good compression rate compared to PM-Tree.
3.2.9. GENERIC PEANO PATTERN MASK TREE (GPPM TREE)
The Generic PPM tree is an enhanced version of PPM-Tree, which overcomes the draw back of
P-Tree and PMM-Tree for low compression because of lower order bits are compressed the
neighbouring bits and may not share the same values with high probability. When probability of
sharing the same bit value is low, Pure-0 and Pure-1 are impossible. Hence to over-come this,
GPPM-Tree introduced 3 dynamic patterns in place of Pure-1, Pure-0 and P [15, 16]. The
dynamic patterns are P1, P2 and P3.
3.3. MEASURING COMPRESSED IMAGE
The compression factor is used to numerically quantify the amount of data reduction in numbers.
The compression factor is calculated based on uncompressed original size of an image and size of
an image after compression [3]. Following is the formula to compute CF:
Compression factor (CF) = uncompressed file size / compressed file size
Another way of measuring algorithm’s performance is to find average number of bits required to
encode single symbol, which is called as compression rate or Bits Per Pixel (BPP).
BPP = 8 / CF.

91
Each algorithm works best on certain kind of image. Algorithm cannot be applied on all kind of
images, which results into disaster. Hence, it is very important to identify the kind of images it is
suitable and gives best result compared to other algorithm.
4. PROPOSED PIXEL SIZE REDUCTION LOSS-LESS ALGORITHM
The encoding part of proposed Pixel Size Reduction image compression algorithm includes 3
main tasks. The first part performs preparation of pixel occurrence table for each colour
component of 24-bits RGB image and stores in order. The second task is to do, re-valuing the
pixel based maximum occurrence to 0, next occurrence to 1 and so on and representing pixel with
least binary bits instead of 8 bits per pixel. While revaluing pixel, prepare header information for
each pixel to help reconstruct pixel during decoding. Last step is to compress header pixels
formed by Pixel Size Reduction, using LZW encoder and write out the compressed file.
4.1. COMPRESSION ALGORITHM
The proposed Pixel Size Reduction loss-less image-compression algorithm works by simply
representing pixel in least number of binary bits from each symbol. It makes sure that; maximum
occurring symbol will become 0, next maximum occurring symbol will become 1 and so on till
255.
Algorithm:
Step 01: Read image if empty go to Step 10
Step 02: Prepare Pixel Occurrence table and have in order
Step 03: Repeat Steps 4 thru 7 till EOF.
Step 04: Read each Pixel
Step 05: Get its re-valued pixel
Step 06: Put Pixel in minimum bits. Like Decimal 9 should be in binary 1001 instead of
00001001
Step 07: Find out length of minimum bits and store it as header information for pixel
Step 08: Compress 'header information' using LZW algorithm
Step 09: Write out pixels bits of least size and compressed header into file.
Step 10: stop.
4.2. DECOMPRESSION ALGORITHM
It is the process of un-compressing the compressed image using proposed Pixel Size Reduction
loss-less image compression algorithm. The decoding process starts by reading compressed
image, and constructing Pixel Occurrence table, decompressing header using LZW decoder and
decompression actual data using header information. The algorithm to decode the compressed file
is depicted in the next section.
Algorithm:
Step 01: Read compressed image file
Step 02: If file is empty go to step 9 otherwise Step 3
Step 03: Prepare pixel re-valuing table
Step 04: Decode header info using lzw decoder algorithm
Step 05: Repeat Steps 6 thru 8 till EOF otherwise go to step 9
Step 06: Read symbols from encoded file
Step 07: Read length of pixel from header info and re-construct pixel

92
Step 08: Get original pixel from Pixel Re-valuing table
Step 09: Write into decoded file.
Step 10: Stop.
5. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The performance of proposed PSR encoding and decoding algorithm experimented on few
hundreds of BMP images selected for experiment purpose did better. The 2 sets of image results
have been shown in this paper. The image sets include 24-bits RGB images. The proposed PSR
algorithm performs better compare to other algorithms listed in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Figure 2, the compression ratio result of Huffman and GPPM algorithms have been taken from
[15]. The Huffman and GPPM also are loss-less compression techniques. These results are being
compared with proposed PSR algorithm. The experimental results of Figure 2, show that,
proposed PSR algorithm performs better than Huffman and GPPM. The compression ratio of
PSR, Huffman and GPPM has been shown along with line graph in Figure 2.
.
Comparing results of PSR with Huffman and GPPM
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Name of Image
CompressionRatio
Proposed PSR Huffman GPPM
Proposed PSR 1.50149 1.07544 1.10953 1.17538 1.18983 1.10992
Huffman 1.3688 1.0405 1.046 1.1059 1.1877 1.0672
GPPM 1.176 1.0675 1.0505 1.1616 1.1709 1.0946
Bandon Bear Brandyrose Kid Lochness Opera
Figure 2. Comparing proposed PSR algorithm with Huffman [15] and GPPM [15] for images of size 512 X
512
The Figure 3, includes images of type synthetic. It includes name of image, size of an image,
compressed size, original size of an image. The images chosen are of different dimension. In
Figure 3, the proposed PSR has been compared with TIFF, TGA, RLE, Huffman and PCX loss-
less compression algorithms. The TIFF results are generated using Windows XP’s ‘paint’
program and other algorithm results are generated using Image Magic tool from Linux platform.
The proposed PSR algorithm performed better in terms of compressed size compared to TIFF,
TGA, RLE, Huffman and PCX in most of the cases as shown in Figure 3. In few images, PSR
performed close to PCX especially in sea_dusk, sunset and, yahoo images.

93
Comparing Proposed PSR algorith with other algorithm of same category for compressed size
4,000
204,000
404,000
604,000
804,000
1,004,000
1,204,000
1,404,000
SizeofCompressedimage
Proposed LZT TIFF TGA RLE Huffman PCX
Proposed LZT 8,363 76,786 60,779 190,121 439,912 165,961 28,140 19,871 51,615 90,426 1,019,24 84,953 1,281,42
TIFF 13,318 171,414 87,298 442,020 926,798 623,026 27,120 53,120 58,602 97,736 1,173,47 108,870 1,376,89
TGA 36,981 183,618 451,326 471,918 921,618 883,053 81,438 83,898 170,784 192,018 1,162,83 182,754 1,440,01
RLE 13,331 168,747 90,848 437,846 918,406 617,669 26,665 51,868 57,461 93,040 1,163,82 106,958 1,349,15
Huffman 9,442 93,154 79,612 307,741 563,286 202,159 28,848 25,416 48,197 90,627 1,019,29 85,792 1,274,80
PCX 14,403 84,212 36,519 22,383 271,622 136,735 27,116 19,074 119,794 96,267 1,136,93 89,753 1,136,49
111 X 111612 X 100526 X 286484 X 325640 X 480633 X 465460 X 59466 X 60179 X 318320 X 200763 X 508564 X 108800 X 600
37,350 183,654 451,934 471,954 921,654 883,554 81,474 84,054 171,774 192,054 1,164,390 182,790 1,440,054
music netscape party8 sea_dusk sunset winaw yahoo benjerry books descent fractal gate ghouse-
256
Figure 3. Comparison of Synthetic [21] compressed image of proposed PSR with TIFF, TGA, RLE,
Huffman and PCX.
6. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we introduced the principles of Pixel Size Reduction (PSR) image compression
loss-less image compression algorithm. We also had shown the procedures of compression and
decompression of proposed PSR loss-less image compression algorithm. The PSR performed
better in compressing 24-bits RGB images including Synthetic color images compare to other
algorithms shown in the results. This algorithm has been experimented on thousands of images
and shown sample result in this paper. It performed well in synthetic image set in almost all cases
and come close to PCX in few cases. The proposed algorithm performs better when highest
occurring unique pixels are more.
As for the direction of future studies, it might be interesting topics to consider using this method
in other Tree based loss-less image compression algorithms.

94
REFERENCES
[1] Sachin Dhawan, “A Review of Image Compression and Comparison of its Algorithms”, International
Journal of electronics & Communication technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 22-26, March 2011.
[2] Sindhu M and Rajkamal R, “Images and Its Compression Techniques – A Review”, ACEEE,
International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol 2, no. 4, pp. 71-75, November 2009.
[3] S Jayaraman, S Esakkirajan and T Veerakumar, Digital Image Processing, 3rd Reprint, Tata McGraw
Hill, 2010.
[4] Ida Mengyi Pu, Fundamental Data Compression, 1st ed., Butterworth-Heinemann publications, 2006.
[5] Jagadish H Pujar, “A New Lossless Method of Image Compression And Decompression Using
Huffman Coding Techniques”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 15,
no. 1, pp. 18-23, 2010.
[6] Jeeffrey Scott Vitter, "Dynamic Huffman Coding", ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software,
vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 158-167, June 1989.
[7] Jeffrey Scott Vitter, "Design and Analysis of Dynamic Huffman Codes", Journal of the Association
for Computing Machinery, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 825-845, October 1987.
[8] Nishad PM, R.Manicka Chezian, "Enhanced LZW (Lempel-Ziv-Welch) Algorithm by Binary Search
with Multiple Dictionary to Reduce Time Complexity for Dictionary Creation in Encoding and
Decoding", International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software
Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192-198, March 2012.
[9] Ian H Willen, Radford M Neal, and John G Cleary, "Arithmetic Coding For Data Compression",
Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 520-540, June 1987.
[10] Khalid Sayood, Lossless Compression Handbook, ACADEMIC PRESS, 2003.
[11] Fazle Rabbi, Mohammad Hossain, et. al. “Lossless Image Compression using P-tree”, in Proceedings
of ICCIT 2003, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
[12] Li-yangchun, “Image Compression Based on P-tree”, in 2nd International Conference Information
Science and Engineering (ICISE), pp. 4550-4553, Dec. 4-6, 2010.
[13] Xiaobo Li, Jason Knipe, Howard Cheng, “Image compression and encryption using tree structures”,
Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 18, no. 11-13, pp. 1253-1259, November, 1997.
[14] Shams Mahmood Imam, S M Rezaul Hoque, et. al, “A New Technique of Lossless Image
Compression using PPM-Tree”, in Proceedings of 8th International Conference of Computer and
Information Technology (ICCIT), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2005.
[15] Dr. M.Mohamed Sathik, S.Radhakrishnan and Dr. R K Selvakumar, “GPPM Tree in CFA Image
Compression”, International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp.
84-87, September 2011.
[16] Mohammad Kabir Hossain, Shams MImam, Khondker Shajadul Hasan and William Perrizo, “A
Lossless Image Compression Technique Using Generic Peano Pattern Mask Tree”, in Proceedings of
11th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT 2008), pp. 317-322,
Dec. 24-27, 2008.
[17] Terry A Welch, "A Technique for High Performance Data Compression", IEEE Computer, vol. 17,
no. 6, pp. 8-19, June 1984
[18] Ming Yang, Nikolaos Bourbakis, “An Overview of Loss-less Digital Image Compression
Techniques”, in 48th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 1099-1102, Aug 7-10, 2005.
[19] Che-Chern Lin, “A Modified PCX Image Compression Algorithm”, 7th WSEAS Int. Conf. on
Applied Computer & Applied Computational Science (ACACOS '08), Hangzhou, China, pp. 740-
745, April 6-8, 2008.
[20] Sindhu M, Rajkamal R, “Images and Its Compression Techniques –A Review”, International Journal
of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 71-75, November 2009.
[21] “The Synthetic image database”, ftp://ftp.ieeta.pt/~ap/images/synthetic/, Feb 25, 2012.
[22] Simrandeep kaur, V Sulochana Verma, “Design and Implementation of LZW Data Compression
Algorithm”, International Journal of Information Sciences and Techniques, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 71-81,
July 2012.

95
AUTHORS
Pralhadrao V Shantagiri received the MIT in Information Technology from Manipal
University, Karnataka, India and MS in VLSI CAD from Manipal University, Manipal,
Karnataka. Presently pursuing M.Phil in Computer Science from Christ University,
Karnataka, India and awaiting result of Viva-Voce of his thesis work on Image
Compression Technique. Currently, he is working with Synopsys India as R & D
Engineer, Bangalore. His topic of interest includes Image Compression, Data Structure,
Algorithm Development, VLSI Test and EDA. Email is gpralhadrao@gmail.com.
Saravanan K N has obtained his Bachelor Degree in Science from Madhurai Kamaraj
University, Tamil Nadu, India, in 1994, Master Degree in Computer Science from
Madhurai Kamaraj University, Tamil Nadu, India, in 1996, Master of Philosophy in
Computer Science from Bharathidasan University, Tamilnadu, India in 2006. He is
working as a Assistant Professor at Department of Computer Science, Christ
University, Karnataka, India. His research interest includes Image Processing, Image
Compression and, Data Structure and Algorithm. He enjoys Teaching various subjects
in Computer Science. He attended around 11 National and International Conferences and has publication in
his name. Email-id is saravanan.kn@christuniversity.in.

PIXEL SIZE REDUCTION LOSS-LESS IMAGE COMPRESSION ALGORITHM

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (8)

Similar to PIXEL SIZE REDUCTION LOSS-LESS IMAGE COMPRESSION ALGORITHM (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

PIXEL SIZE REDUCTION LOSS-LESS IMAGE COMPRESSION ALGORITHM