-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Turn the checkbox-lists of supported platforms and languages into normal bullet lists: Resolves #350 #351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Turn the checkbox-lists of supported platforms and languages into normal bullet lists: Resolves #350 #351
Conversation
WalkthroughThe documentation was updated to replace checkbox lists of supported software forges and languages with standard bullet points. Previously listed but unsupported options were removed. The explanatory text about Bitbucket support remains unchanged. No code or logic was altered; only documentation formatting and content were modified. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/finishing-touches/docstrings.md (1)
63-79
: Supported languages list is concise and well-ordered
Removing the previously unchecked entries—Haskell and Scala—makes the list unambiguous and it appears correctly sorted. Nit: consider changing “Php” to the canonical uppercase “PHP” to match common styling conventions.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~64-~64: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...hese languages are supported: - Bash - C - C# - C++ - Elixir - Go - Java - JavaScrip...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/finishing-touches/docstrings.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/finishing-touches/docstrings.md
[duplication] ~64-~64: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...hese languages are supported: - Bash - C - C# - C++ - Elixir - Go - Java - JavaScrip...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/finishing-touches/docstrings.md (1)
53-55
: Bulleted list for supported forges is clear and accurate
The conversion from checkboxes to simple bullets removes ambiguity, and the list now only reflects actively supported platforms (Azure DevOps, GitHub, GitLab). Great work.
fixes #350
Problem:
The Supported Software Forges documentation section uses checkbox lists to indicate supported and unsupported platforms/languages. This design is ambiguous, especially for unchecked items—it's unclear whether they represent unsupported but recognized platforms, or something else entirely. This confusion weakens the clarity and usefulness of the documentation.
Solution:
Refactor the list formatting by:
Affected Components:
/finishing-touches/docstrings
Acceptance Criteria: