-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
Performance #170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Performance #170
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3150301
Tons of various performance tweaks
kddnewton ed0c475
Split up find_token options into more explicit variants
kddnewton 840ebab
Even more performance tweaks
kddnewton b5d226b
Move lambdas into their own methods, smarter token finding in on_args…
kddnewton 7b6dbeb
More micro-optimizations
kddnewton 929726b
Remove remaining pattern matching
kddnewton b5154ac
each_line instead of split
kddnewton e31dded
Update the prettier_print version
kddnewton b117c9b
Fix message checking accidentally introduced when removing pattern ma…
kddnewton f5ac5fe
Reformat
kddnewton 95b2584
Fix incorrect logic in forced_brace_bounds? translation
kddnewton 89081df
Fix up rubocop violations
kddnewton 8f15bbb
Check if this is working on truffleruby
kddnewton aa0573d
Fix incorrect translation of Ternaryable.call
kddnewton 7b2bc9b
Remove truffleruby from tests until we finish removing pattern matching
kddnewton File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hum, that polyfill might trick other gems or code into thinking they are on 3.0. Have you considered using a refinement here? I generally avoid them like the plague, but for unobstrusive polyfill I found them relatively useful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh yeah I can make it a refinement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Turns out I stopped using it in as many places as I thought, this is much better now
#172