Skip to content

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Fixes #101421
cc #100838

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @wesleywiser

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 5, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 5, 2022
expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>,
msg: String,
num_assoc_fn_excess_args: usize,
num_trait_generics_except_self: usize,
) {
if let hir::ExprKind::MethodCall(_, args, _) = expr.kind {
assert_eq!(args.len(), 1);
Copy link
Member Author

@compiler-errors compiler-errors Sep 5, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing enforces this assertion as a precondition, and also it's artificially quite limiting. There's no reason we can't make this suggestion for when there are >1 arguments, and so I generalized it -- that's where most of this new logic comes from.

@compiler-errors compiler-errors force-pushed the issue-101421 branch 2 times, most recently from 04bf53a to 763b3a5 Compare September 5, 2022 00:53
Copy link
Contributor

@cjgillot cjgillot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm usually not a fan of span_to_snippet, but I don't see how else this would work here.
r=me with a few nits

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 5, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #101261) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=cjgillot

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 5, 2022

📌 Commit bee48e3 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 5, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2022
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100658 (TyCtxt::get_attr should check that no duplicates are allowed)
 - rust-lang#101021 (Migrate ``rustc_middle`` diagnostic)
 - rust-lang#101287 (Document eager evaluation of `bool::then_some` argument)
 - rust-lang#101412 (Some more cleanup in `core`)
 - rust-lang#101427 (Fix ICE, generalize 'move generics to trait' suggestion for >0 non-rcvr arguments)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8936211 into rust-lang:master Sep 6, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 6, 2022
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the issue-101421 branch November 2, 2022 02:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

thread 'rustc' panicked at 'assertion failed: (left == right) when calling a trait method with more generic arguments than expected (nightly)
6 participants