refactor proof tree formatting #113570
Merged
refactor proof tree formatting #113570
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lqd
reviewed
Jul 11, 2023
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
this doesn't make sense to me 😅 testing clippy passes for me xx and the errors look unrelated to me |
|
IIUC it's a spurious CI bug that is unrelated to your PR, it's happening on a bunch of PRs lately 😓 |
|
r=me when clippy decides to stop bricking rust-lang/rust's entire bors queue |
|
@bors r=BoxyUwU rollup (new solver) |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
refactor proof tree formatting mostly: - handle indentation via a separate formatter - change nested to use a closure tested it after rebasing on top of rust-lang#113536 and everything looks good. r? `@BoxyUwU`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
refactor proof tree formatting mostly: - handle indentation via a separate formatter - change nested to use a closure tested it after rebasing on top of rust-lang#113536 and everything looks good. r? ``@BoxyUwU``
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
refactor proof tree formatting mostly: - handle indentation via a separate formatter - change nested to use a closure tested it after rebasing on top of rust-lang#113536 and everything looks good. r? ```@BoxyUwU```
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
refactor proof tree formatting mostly: - handle indentation via a separate formatter - change nested to use a closure tested it after rebasing on top of rust-lang#113536 and everything looks good. r? ````@BoxyUwU````
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#113536 (avoid building proof trees in select) - rust-lang#113558 (Only use max_line_length = 100 for *.rs) - rust-lang#113570 (refactor proof tree formatting) - rust-lang#113623 (Add jump to doc) - rust-lang#113629 (Add Adt to SMIR) - rust-lang#113631 (make MCP510 behavior opt-in to avoid conflicts between the CLI and target flavors) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
mostly:
tested it after rebasing on top of #113536 and everything looks good.
r? @BoxyUwU