Skip to content

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

Made redundant in 3f697b8

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 12, 2024

r? @wesleywiser

rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 12, 2024
Made redundant in 3f697b8
Comment on lines -1076 to -1081
&& self
.tcx
.at(span)
.type_of(*def_id)
.instantiate_identity()
!= rcvr_ty
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@compiler-errors you updated this 3f697b8, but I'm not sure changing the use of actual to rcvr_ty is correct here. My read of the comment above suggests we explicitly wanted to compare the type before and after resolve_vars_if_possible.

Am I misreading this?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't believe it makes sense to compare before rcvr_ty has been resolved, so it makes sense to remove this branch. At least according to that commit, it was not actually ever being exercised either?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this has been essentially unchanged since it was added in #84221 which didn't add a test that covers the Box<Self> case the comment talks about.

I don't have an objection to removing the check, just thought I'd flag it as a bit suspicious 🙂

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 13, 2024

📌 Commit c51b9ff has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 13, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120696 (Properly handle `async` block and `async fn` in `if` exprs without `else`)
 - rust-lang#120751 (Provide more suggestions on invalid equality where bounds)
 - rust-lang#120802 (Bail out of drop elaboration when encountering error types)
 - rust-lang#120967 (docs: mention round-to-even in precision formatting)
 - rust-lang#120973 (allow static_mut_ref in some tests that specifically test mutable statics)
 - rust-lang#120974 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API change: Add support for EXPORTAS name types)
 - rust-lang#120986 (iterator.rs: remove "Basic usage" text)
 - rust-lang#120987 (remove redundant logic)
 - rust-lang#120988 (fix comment)
 - rust-lang#120995 (PassWrapper: adapt for llvm/llvm-project@93cdd1b5cfa3735c)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7427460 into rust-lang:master Feb 13, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 13, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120987 - tshepang:redundant, r=compiler-errors

remove redundant logic

Made redundant in 3f697b8
@tshepang tshepang deleted the redundant branch April 14, 2025 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants