Skip to content

Conversation

lqd
Copy link
Member

@lqd lqd commented Jun 6, 2024

As discussed in today's t-compiler meeting, this reverts PR #124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions #125199.

r? @wesleywiser

Opening as draft so that @wesleywiser and @apiraino, you can tell me whether you wanted:

  1. a beta-accepted revert of Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions #124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though [beta] backports #126093 may be the last of those)
  2. a revert of Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions #124099 on beta?
  3. all of the above?

I also opened #126102, another draft PR to revert #124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.

…xpr-attrs, r=davidtwco"

This reverts commit 57dad1d, reversing
changes made to 36316df.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 6, 2024
@wesleywiser wesleywiser marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2024 22:30
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 6, 2024

Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt

cc @rust-lang/rustfmt

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Thanks @lqd! I think we need to go with option 3: landing the revert on both nightly and beta.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 6, 2024

📌 Commit 216424d has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 6, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
[beta] Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 on beta to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? `@wesleywiser`

This is the revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta that I mentioned in rust-lang#126101, in case that's what you also wanted. Opening as draft in case it's not.

I'm not well-versed in these backports, so I hope I did it right 😓
@cuviper cuviper mentioned this pull request Jun 7, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports

- Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761
- Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908
- Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978
- Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184
- Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392
- Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489
- ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734
- Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061
- Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta rust-lang#126102 / rust-lang#126101
- Silence double-symlink errors while building solaris toolchain rust-lang#126011

r? cuviper
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? `@wesleywiser`

Opening as draft so that `@wesleywiser` and `@apiraino,` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125606 (Size optimize int formatting)
 - rust-lang#125724 (Uplift `Relate`/`TypeRelation` into `rustc_next_trait_solver`)
 - rust-lang#126040 (Don't warn on fields in the `unreachable_pub` lint )
 - rust-lang#126065 (mark binding undetermined if target name exist and not obtained)
 - rust-lang#126098 (Remove `same-lib-two-locations-no-panic` run-make test)
 - rust-lang#126099 (Crate loader cleanups)
 - rust-lang#126101 (Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly)
 - rust-lang#126103 (Improve Docs for `hir::Impl` and `hir::ImplItem`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125606 (Size optimize int formatting)
 - rust-lang#125724 (Uplift `Relate`/`TypeRelation` into `rustc_next_trait_solver`)
 - rust-lang#126040 (Don't warn on fields in the `unreachable_pub` lint )
 - rust-lang#126098 (Remove `same-lib-two-locations-no-panic` run-make test)
 - rust-lang#126099 (Crate loader cleanups)
 - rust-lang#126101 (Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly)
 - rust-lang#126103 (Improve Docs for `hir::Impl` and `hir::ImplItem`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit b1ab8d5 into rust-lang:master Jun 7, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone Jun 7, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126101 - lqd:revert-124099, r=wesleywiser

Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? ``@wesleywiser``

Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
@lqd lqd deleted the revert-124099 branch June 7, 2024 09:42
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports

- Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761
- Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908
- Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978
- Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184
- Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392
- Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489
- ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734
- Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061
- Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta rust-lang#126102 / rust-lang#126101
- Silence double-symlink errors while building solaris toolchain rust-lang#126011

r? cuviper
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly

As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199.

r? ``@wesleywiser``

Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted:
1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those)
2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta?
3. all of the above?

I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants