Fix rustdoc field visibility checks #13353
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fields are now default-private, not default-public
|
Oops, looks like @alexcrichton beat me to it: #13319 |
matthiaskrgr
pushed a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2022
…Veykril Fix assertion failure in type inference (rust-lang#13352) Fixes rust-lang/rust-analyzer#13352
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2025
close rust-lang#13353 Using `contains()` for slices are more efficient than using `iter().any()`. changelog: [`manual_contains`]: new lint
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fields are now default-private, not default-public