Sort triples by name in platform_support.md #134815
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2024
|
r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2024
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134606 (ptr::copy: fix docs for the overlapping case) - rust-lang#134622 (Windows: Use WriteFile to write to a UTF-8 console) - rust-lang#134759 (compiletest: Remove the `-test` suffix from normalize directives) - rust-lang#134787 (Spruce up the docs of several queries related to the type/trait system and const eval) - rust-lang#134806 (rustdoc: use shorter paths as preferred canonical paths) - rust-lang#134815 (Sort triples by name in platform_support.md) - rust-lang#134816 (tools: fix build failure caused by PR rust-lang#134420) - rust-lang#134819 (Fix mistake in windows file open) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134815 - 9names:sort_platform_md_targets, r=jieyouxu Sort triples by name in platform_support.md When looking for riscv32emc support, I missed it at first because it was at the end of the tier3 target list [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/platform-support.html#tier-3). These lists are *mostly* dictionary sorted so I assumed it should be near the riscv32i* targets. This PR puts all targets back in dictionary order. There were only a few outside of tier3. I ended up writing a small program to sort them because I did not trust myself to do it manually, but I stopped short of fully automating it. I have manually reviewed the output to confirm it still has the same number of entries, and that the changed values do follow the ordering I would expect. For folks who would prefer to review code than manual textual changes, the sorting program (including inputs) is [here.](https://github.com/9names/platform_sort_arch/blob/main/src/main.rs)
poliorcetics
pushed a commit
to poliorcetics/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2024
…=jieyouxu Sort triples by name in platform_support.md When looking for riscv32emc support, I missed it at first because it was at the end of the tier3 target list [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/platform-support.html#tier-3). These lists are *mostly* dictionary sorted so I assumed it should be near the riscv32i* targets. This PR puts all targets back in dictionary order. There were only a few outside of tier3. I ended up writing a small program to sort them because I did not trust myself to do it manually, but I stopped short of fully automating it. I have manually reviewed the output to confirm it still has the same number of entries, and that the changed values do follow the ordering I would expect. For folks who would prefer to review code than manual textual changes, the sorting program (including inputs) is [here.](https://github.com/9names/platform_sort_arch/blob/main/src/main.rs)
poliorcetics
pushed a commit
to poliorcetics/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2024
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134606 (ptr::copy: fix docs for the overlapping case) - rust-lang#134622 (Windows: Use WriteFile to write to a UTF-8 console) - rust-lang#134759 (compiletest: Remove the `-test` suffix from normalize directives) - rust-lang#134787 (Spruce up the docs of several queries related to the type/trait system and const eval) - rust-lang#134806 (rustdoc: use shorter paths as preferred canonical paths) - rust-lang#134815 (Sort triples by name in platform_support.md) - rust-lang#134816 (tools: fix build failure caused by PR rust-lang#134420) - rust-lang#134819 (Fix mistake in windows file open) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to tautschnig/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134606 (ptr::copy: fix docs for the overlapping case) - rust-lang#134622 (Windows: Use WriteFile to write to a UTF-8 console) - rust-lang#134759 (compiletest: Remove the `-test` suffix from normalize directives) - rust-lang#134787 (Spruce up the docs of several queries related to the type/trait system and const eval) - rust-lang#134806 (rustdoc: use shorter paths as preferred canonical paths) - rust-lang#134815 (Sort triples by name in platform_support.md) - rust-lang#134816 (tools: fix build failure caused by PR rust-lang#134420) - rust-lang#134819 (Fix mistake in windows file open) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When looking for riscv32emc support, I missed it at first because it was at the end of the tier3 target list here. These lists are mostly dictionary sorted so I assumed it should be near the riscv32i* targets.
This PR puts all targets back in dictionary order. There were only a few outside of tier3.
I ended up writing a small program to sort them because I did not trust myself to do it manually, but I stopped short of fully automating it.
I have manually reviewed the output to confirm it still has the same number of entries, and that the changed values do follow the ordering I would expect.
For folks who would prefer to review code than manual textual changes, the sorting program (including inputs) is here.