Skip to content

Conversation

frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

@frewsxcv frewsxcv commented Dec 3, 2017

Some checked operations use rhs as a parameter name, and some use
other. For the sake of consistency, unify everything under the rhs
name.

Fixes #46308.

Some checked operations use `rhs` as a parameter name, and some use
`other`. For the sake of consistency, unify everything under the `rhs`
name.

Fixes rust-lang#46308.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @TimNN

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@kennytm kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools labels Dec 3, 2017
@TimNN
Copy link
Contributor

TimNN commented Dec 3, 2017

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2017

📌 Commit a2d87d8 has been approved by TimNN

frewsxcv added a commit to frewsxcv/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2017
Consistent parameter name for numeric ‘checked’ operations.

Some checked operations use `rhs` as a parameter name, and some use
`other`. For the sake of consistency, unify everything under the `rhs`
name.

Fixes rust-lang#46308.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2017
Rollup of 8 pull requests

- Successful merges: #45957, #46260, #46432, #46442, #46454, #46462, #46465, #46473
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit a2d87d8 into rust-lang:master Dec 4, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 4, 2017

⌛ Testing commit a2d87d8 with merge fdfbcf8...

@frewsxcv frewsxcv deleted the frewsxcv-param-name branch December 19, 2017 01:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants