Add a specialization of read_exact for Cursor. #46485
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The read_exact implementation for &[u8] is optimized and usually allows LLVM to reduce a read_exact call for small numbers of bytes to a bounds check and a register load instead of a generic memcpy. On a workload I have that decompresses, deserializes (via bincode), and processes some data, this leads to a 40% speedup by essentially eliminating the deserialization overhead entirely.
|
Cc @Manishearth |
|
@bors r+ Seems innocuous; shouldn't change any behavior. |
|
📌 Commit 02c1862 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2017
Add a specialization of read_exact for Cursor. The read_exact implementation for &[u8] is optimized and usually allows LLVM to reduce a read_exact call for small numbers of bytes to a bounds check and a register load instead of a generic memcpy. On a workload I have that decompresses, deserializes (via bincode), and processes some data, this leads to a 40% speedup by essentially eliminating the deserialization overhead entirely.
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The read_exact implementation for &[u8] is optimized and usually allows LLVM to reduce a read_exact call for small numbers of bytes to a bounds check and a register load instead of a generic memcpy. On a workload I have that decompresses, deserializes (via bincode), and processes some data, this leads to a 40% speedup by essentially eliminating the deserialization overhead entirely.