Remove ? macro separator compatibility note from 1.27 release notes
#51591
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The implementation has been reverted.
|
@bors r+ p=20 @rust-lang/compiler Can someone beta-approve this? We're promoting beta to stable quite soon. |
|
📌 Commit b676b37 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2018
Remove `?` macro separator compatibility note from 1.27 release notes The implementation has been reverted in #51417, so this no longer applies to 1.27.0. r? @Mark-Simulacrum
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2018
[beta] Rollup backports * #51261: Updated RELEASES.md for 1.27.0 * #51591: Remove `?` macro separator compatibility note from 1.27 release notes r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The implementation has been reverted in #51417, so this no longer applies to 1.27.0.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum