Skip to content

Conversation

camelid
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid commented Dec 31, 2020

The command is @!has, not !@has. I don't think these checks were
doing anything before! Ideally we would accept !@has as well, or at
least fail tests that use !@has. The current behavior seems to be
silently ignoring the check, which is very confusing.

r? @GuillaumeGomez

The command is `@!has`, not `!@has`. I don't think these checks were
doing anything before! Ideally we would accept `!@has` as well, or at
least fail tests that use `!@has`. The current behavior seems to be
silently ignoring the check, which is very confusing.
@camelid camelid added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc C-bug Category: This is a bug. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 31, 2020
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 31, 2020
@camelid
Copy link
Member Author

camelid commented Dec 31, 2020

I made this mistake myself in #80368 (though I caught it).

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks a lot!

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 31, 2020

📌 Commit 2c405ae has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 31, 2020
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2020
Fix tests that incorrectly used `!@has` instead of `@!has`

The command is ``@!has`,` not `!`@has`.` I don't think these checks were
doing anything before! Ideally we would accept `!`@has`` as well, or at
least fail tests that use `!`@has`.` The current behavior seems to be
silently ignoring the check, which is very confusing.

r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 2c405ae with merge 206ee1e...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 1, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 206ee1e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jan 1, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 206ee1e into rust-lang:master Jan 1, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.51.0 milestone Jan 1, 2021
@camelid camelid deleted the fix-not-has branch January 1, 2021 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc C-bug Category: This is a bug. merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants